A Systems Theory of Love

This paper proposes a systems theory of love as a relational process governed by expression, reception, and reciprocal reflection. It argues that love cannot be fully understood as a feeling or a state, but must be modeled as a dynamic loop with identifiable nodes, failure points, and sustainability conditions. The framework introduces the Returning Principle — the claim that love is not merely given or received but returned — and builds from it a Love Feedback Loop specified as a three-stage cycle: expression, receiving, and reflection and feedback. The paper distinguishes two principal dimensions of love (quality and capacity) and identifies three functional capacities — absorption, processing, and reflection — whose obstruction explains why love can be genuinely present yet functionally incomplete. A sustainability condition is introduced as a fourth variable governing whether the loop self-reinforces or decays over time. It is given a positive form: the loop sustains itself when return is motivated by anticipation of a good experience, not by the cost of not returning. A loop held together only by the cost of exit is sustained in form while its willingness decays. The paper also examines willingness as evaluated participation, the distortion of willingness by past trauma, selective participation, reluctant responsibility, and the asymmetric distribution of maintenance work. The integrated framework specifies four variables — quality, capacity, willingness, and sustainability — that together account for the principal ways a love relationship can function well or fail. The framework is conceptual rather than empirical. It makes no claims beyond what the internal logic of the model supports, and it is offered as a vocabulary for thinking more precisely about relational failure without reducing it to the absence of feeling.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2026-11-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.24125437
Primary Topic
Attachment and Relationship Dynamics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
NOV
article

A Systems Theory of Love

Atyanta Wibhawa
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Attachment and Relationship Dynamics
article

A Systems Theory of Love

Atyanta Wibhawa
article en

Abstract

This paper proposes a systems theory of love as a relational process governed by expression, reception, and reciprocal reflection. It argues that love cannot be fully understood as a feeling or a state, but must be modeled as a dynamic loop with identifiable nodes, failure points, and sustainability conditions. The framework introduces the Returning Principle — the claim that love is not merely given or received but returned — and builds from it a Love Feedback Loop specified as a three-stage cycle: expression, receiving, and reflection and feedback. The paper distinguishes two principal dimensions of love (quality and capacity) and identifies three functional capacities — absorption, processing, and reflection — whose obstruction explains why love can be genuinely present yet functionally incomplete. A sustainability condition is introduced as a fourth variable governing whether the loop self-reinforces or decays over time. It is given a positive form: the loop sustains itself when return is motivated by anticipation of a good experience, not by the cost of not returning. A loop held together only by the cost of exit is sustained in form while its willingness decays. The paper also examines willingness as evaluated participation, the distortion of willingness by past trauma, selective participation, reluctant responsibility, and the asymmetric distribution of maintenance work. The integrated framework specifies four variables — quality, capacity, willingness, and sustainability — that together account for the principal ways a love relationship can function well or fail. The framework is conceptual rather than empirical. It makes no claims beyond what the internal logic of the model supports, and it is offered as a vocabulary for thinking more precisely about relational failure without reducing it to the absence of feeling.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Attachment and Relationship Dynamics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon