Improving the assessment of the head losses in the penstock of a hydroelectric dam

In engineering, one of the common problems is determining head losses in operational structures. Determining this parameter has been the focus of studies for many years. As a result, several approaches have been developed with the main aim of minimising the discrepancies between experimental values and theoretical values. Until now, this determination has been made by considering the characteristics of the structure in new condition and under ideal operating conditions. This does not take into account the environment and the actual operating conditions of each structure. With this in mind, we have proposed another method for determining head loss in a pressurised pipe. To do this, we modelled the penstocks of two hydroelectric dams in Cameroon (the Songloulou and Lagdo dams) in Gambit 2.2 software. Next, we used Fluent 6.2.2 to simulate the flow of clear water through this structure in order to see the impact of the structure’s configuration (layout) on the determination of the friction coefficient and, consequently, the pressure drop. This simulation initially allowed us to see a variation in the velocity in the pipe, despite the inlet velocity. This clearly shows the limitations of the standard analytical approach, which considers a constant velocity for a section of pipe, regardless of its length. Knowing that a variation in velocity implies a variation in friction, we graphically generated the evolution of friction on each wall. This allowed us to confirm that for the same section of pipe and at the same velocity, we have different values for the friction coefficient. We then proposed an improved expression that takes into account the variation in key parameters during the operation of structures. Similarly, we proposed a more effective and contextualised alternative approach for structures in their various forms and environments.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Frontiers in Environmental Engineering
Published
2026-11-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3389/fenve.2026.1981862
Primary Topic
Hydraulic flow and structures
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
NOV
article

Improving the assessment of the head losses in the penstock of a hydroelectric dam

Kenmeugne Bienvenu, Tchawe Tchawe Moukam, Tcheukam-Toko Dénis
Frontiers in Environmental Engineering
Hydraulic flow and structures
article

Improving the assessment of the head losses in the penstock of a hydroelectric dam

Kenmeugne Bienvenu, Tchawe Tchawe Moukam, Tcheukam-Toko Dénis
article en

Abstract

In engineering, one of the common problems is determining head losses in operational structures. Determining this parameter has been the focus of studies for many years. As a result, several approaches have been developed with the main aim of minimising the discrepancies between experimental values and theoretical values. Until now, this determination has been made by considering the characteristics of the structure in new condition and under ideal operating conditions. This does not take into account the environment and the actual operating conditions of each structure. With this in mind, we have proposed another method for determining head loss in a pressurised pipe. To do this, we modelled the penstocks of two hydroelectric dams in Cameroon (the Songloulou and Lagdo dams) in Gambit 2.2 software. Next, we used Fluent 6.2.2 to simulate the flow of clear water through this structure in order to see the impact of the structure’s configuration (layout) on the determination of the friction coefficient and, consequently, the pressure drop. This simulation initially allowed us to see a variation in the velocity in the pipe, despite the inlet velocity. This clearly shows the limitations of the standard analytical approach, which considers a constant velocity for a section of pipe, regardless of its length. Knowing that a variation in velocity implies a variation in friction, we graphically generated the evolution of friction on each wall. This allowed us to confirm that for the same section of pipe and at the same velocity, we have different values for the friction coefficient. We then proposed an improved expression that takes into account the variation in key parameters during the operation of structures. Similarly, we proposed a more effective and contextualised alternative approach for structures in their various forms and environments.

Frontiers in Environmental EngineeringVol. 5
Université de Yaoundé I (CM), University of Buea (CM), University of Ngaoundéré (CM)
Hydraulic flow and structures
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon