SAE Parent-Child Theory Paper 1: Another End / SAE 亲子论 Paper 1: 另一个目的

This paper reads what the parent-child relation this series speaks of looks like. The series does not define all parent-child relations; the parent-child relation it reads has as its premise that the end of the father or the mother is headed in the 15DD direction: across one matter after another, headed toward treating the child as an end, and not merely as a means. This direction is a premise, not a component of the parent-child relation; the child never chose to enter this relation, and no further requirement is made here that both sides avow it. There is no parent who stands purely at 15DD; people are all mixed; the direction is read by one operation at a time, falling back is read as it occurs, and it does not overturn the direction. After falling back, this end can turn back: own up to that occasion, and make some change in the arrangements and dealings that follow; where there is persistent refusal to turn back, the direction is no longer at 15DD. Reflection is read from words and deeds, and is confirmed only at the parent's own end; it does not cancel what has already been read, nor does it leave the child owing forgiveness. The series reads relation by relation: father and child are one relation, mother and child another, and a single parent is read the same way. The three kinds apply to a relation as a whole; they are not a sieve that lets each matter in or out of scope one by one. A relation headed toward treating the child as an end is within scope, and every matter within it is read; the relation that treats the child merely as a means, and the relation that does not treat him merely as a means yet is not headed toward treating him as an end either, are both relations that on the whole remain in the 14DD direction and are not headed toward 15DD (this says where a relation is headed; it does not grade a person), and neither is within the parent-child relation this series reads. In whichever kind, the occasion that crosses basic rights is, separately, a violation at the layer of basic rights. The child's standing as an end is full from the start; it is not conferred by the parents, nor revoked by them; what he can do grows, layer by layer, with his phase transitions. The two books are kept apart: "He's still little, he doesn't understand" at most describes what, in some matter, he cannot yet do. He never chose which conditions he first entered, and his own constitutive position does not on that account pass to the parents. DD has two uses for parents and for the child: at the parent's end, 15DD is a stance; at the child's end, DD reads emergence and maturation, and does not become a label; the maturation of the first-person position is checked by content-domain, and the present operation is read separately. The object layer and the operation layer are kept apart: the parent confirms only his own end; if it is later confirmed that the direction premise of the relation being read did not obtain, the series does not unfold it as an object within scope, and does not turn and judge. This paper interfaces with Kant, Hegel and Locke. It does not prove that parents headed in the 15DD direction are better than other parents, nor that this is the only kind of parent-child relation, nor that parents ought to treat the child as an end. --- 这一篇读这个系列所说的亲子关系是什么样子。这个系列不给一切亲子关系下定义;它读的亲子关系,以父或母那一端在 15DD 方向上为前提:在一件件事上,朝把孩子当作目的那一面去,而不只把他当作手段。这个方向是前提,不是亲子关系的组分;孩子没有选过进入这段关系,这里不另要双方认下。没有纯在 15DD 上的父母,人都是混合的;方向按一次运作读,回落照读,不推翻方向。回落以后,这一端能回过头来,认下那一次,在之后的安排与来往里有所改;坚持不回头的,方向已不在 15DD 上。反省从言行里读,确认只在父或母自己那一端;它不撤销已经读出的东西,也不使孩子欠下原谅。 这个系列按每一段读:父与孩子一段,母与孩子一段,单亲同读。三种用在一段上,不作每一件进出射程的筛子:一段朝把孩子当作目的那一面去的,在射程里,段内各件都照读;只把孩子当作手段的,与不只当作手段、也没有朝目的那一面去的,都是总体上停在 14DD 方向、没有朝 15DD 去的那一段(说的是一段关系朝哪里去,不给人定级),不在这个系列读的亲子关系里。不论哪一种,越过基础权利的那一次,另在基础权利一层是侵。孩子作为目的的地位从一开始就是满的,不由父母授予,也不由父母撤销;他能做的事随相变一层一层长出来。两本账分开记:「他还小,还不懂」,至多描述他在某一件事上还做不到什么。他没有选过最初进入哪些条件,他自己的构成位置也不因此转归父母。 DD 在父母与孩子身上两种用法:父母那一端的 15DD 是姿态;孩子那一端用 DD 读涌现与成熟,不成标签,第一人称位的成熟按内容域核,当次的运作另读。对象层与操作层分开:父或母只确认自己这一端;所读那一段的方向前提若后来确认并未成立,这个系列不把它作为射程内的对象展开,不倒判。这一篇与康德、黑格尔、洛克对接。它不证明 15DD 方向的父母比别的父母好,不证明亲子关系只有这一种,也不证明父母应当把孩子当作目的。 English and Chinese editions in one record. The English edition is an independent rewrite of the Chinese text, not a translation; where the two differ, the Chinese governs. Related works: Cites · Publication / Preprint · DOI(26) 10.5281/zenodo.23545115 10.5281/zenodo.23545047 10.5281/zenodo.23545023 10.5281/zenodo.23627790 10.5281/zenodo.23819201 10.5281/zenodo.23819212 10.5281/zenodo.23819245 10.5281/zenodo.23819255 10.5281/zenodo.24029128 10.5281/zenodo.24029132 10.5281/zenodo.22313628 10.5281/zenodo.21285136 10.5281/zenodo.20769253 10.5281/zenodo.21314907 10.5281/zenodo.21405207 10.5281/zenodo.21611154 10.5281/zenodo.22731235 10.5281/zenodo.23287669 10.5281/zenodo.18867389 10.5281/zenodo.19426123 10.5281/zenodo.19436811 10.5281/zenodo.19490707 10.5281/zenodo.19491926 10.5281/zenodo.19044827 10.5281/zenodo.19201631 10.5281/zenodo.19321143