Preoperative colonoscopy after colonic stenting as a bridge to surgery for obstructive colorectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Colonic stenting may allow preoperative evaluation of the proximal colon in patients with obstructive colorectal cancer. We assessed colonoscopy completion, diagnostic yield, procedure-related adverse events, and changes in planned colorectal surgery. We searched PubMed, Embase, Scopus, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library through September 19, 2026. Studies of preoperative colonoscopy after self-expandable metallic stent placement as a bridge to surgery were appraised using Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) checklists. Proportions were pooled using random-effects binomial generalized linear mixed models. Technical completion among documented attempts was the primary outcome. Certainty of evidence was assessed using GRADE. Eleven predominantly observational studies were included. Technical completion was 81.3% (95% CI, 72.2%–87.9%; 7 studies, 261 attempts; I² = 62.7%). Pathway completion was 73.1% (49.0%–88.5%; 8 studies, 452 patients; I² = 94.9%). Synchronous colorectal cancer, including in situ disease, was identified or confirmed in 7.3% (3.3%–15.3%) after completed colonoscopy and 4.8% (2.5%–8.9%) per attempt in the exploratory sensitivity analysis. Adenoma detection was 36.3% (28.3%–45.1%; 3 studies), and planned surgery changed in 2.5% of attempts (0.4%–15.2%; 5 studies). The pooled proportion with any adverse event was 2.2% (0.4%–12.0%; 5 studies, 240 patients), excluding Kim because overlap between bleeding and perforation was unknown. Two perforations were reported among 288 patients in studies reporting this outcome. The certainty of evidence was very low for all six main pooled outcomes. Preoperative colonoscopy was usually completed once attempted and identified findings relevant to surgical planning. Variation in pathway completion and limited safety evidence support individual assessment before the procedure. PROSPERO CRD420261478358.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
BMC Gastroenterology
Published
2026-11-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12876-026-05569-9
Primary Topic
Colorectal Cancer Surgical Treatments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
NOV
article

Preoperative colonoscopy after colonic stenting as a bridge to surgery for obstructive colorectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Ahmad Nouri, EzzElDien A. Ibrahim, Qusay AlQurashi, M. R. Mahmoud et al.
BMC Gastroenterology
Colorectal Cancer Surgical Treatments
article

Preoperative colonoscopy after colonic stenting as a bridge to surgery for obstructive colorectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Ahmad Nouri, EzzElDien A. Ibrahim, Qusay AlQurashi, M. R. Mahmoud, Hassan A. Siddiki, Rania Mustafa, Abdallfatah Abdallfatah, Nour Aldin T. Ahmed, Ammar Al-subh, Yazan Alnairah, Omar Farag, Mutayam Abuqudairi
article en

Abstract

Colonic stenting may allow preoperative evaluation of the proximal colon in patients with obstructive colorectal cancer. We assessed colonoscopy completion, diagnostic yield, procedure-related adverse events, and changes in planned colorectal surgery. We searched PubMed, Embase, Scopus, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library through September 19, 2026. Studies of preoperative colonoscopy after self-expandable metallic stent placement as a bridge to surgery were appraised using Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) checklists. Proportions were pooled using random-effects binomial generalized linear mixed models. Technical completion among documented attempts was the primary outcome. Certainty of evidence was assessed using GRADE. Eleven predominantly observational studies were included. Technical completion was 81.3% (95% CI, 72.2%–87.9%; 7 studies, 261 attempts; I² = 62.7%). Pathway completion was 73.1% (49.0%–88.5%; 8 studies, 452 patients; I² = 94.9%). Synchronous colorectal cancer, including in situ disease, was identified or confirmed in 7.3% (3.3%–15.3%) after completed colonoscopy and 4.8% (2.5%–8.9%) per attempt in the exploratory sensitivity analysis. Adenoma detection was 36.3% (28.3%–45.1%; 3 studies), and planned surgery changed in 2.5% of attempts (0.4%–15.2%; 5 studies). The pooled proportion with any adverse event was 2.2% (0.4%–12.0%; 5 studies, 240 patients), excluding Kim because overlap between bleeding and perforation was unknown. Two perforations were reported among 288 patients in studies reporting this outcome. The certainty of evidence was very low for all six main pooled outcomes. Preoperative colonoscopy was usually completed once attempted and identified findings relevant to surgical planning. Variation in pathway completion and limited safety evidence support individual assessment before the procedure. PROSPERO CRD420261478358.

BMC Gastroenterology
Beni-Suef University (EG), Cleveland Clinic (US), Cairo University (EG), An-Najah National University (PS), Taif University (SA), Mutah University (JO), County Durham and Darlington NHS Foundation Trust (GB), Al-Balqa Applied University (JO), Phoenixville Hospital (US), October 6 University (EG), University of Missouri (US)
Colorectal Cancer Surgical Treatments
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon