Valproic acid inhibits gastric cancer cell hallmarks but impairs wound healing in a PIPAC-inspired in vitro model

Abstract Objectives Valproic acid (VPA), a histone deacetylase inhibitor, has been proposed for pressurized intraperitoneal aerosol chemotherapy (PIPAC) to prevent peritoneal recurrence of gastric cancer while theoretically sparing wound healing. We tested this hypothesis using a PIPAC-inspired in vitro model. Methods MKN-45 gastric cancer cells, neonatal human dermal fibroblasts (NHDF), and mesothelial cells (MeT-5A) were exposed to aerosolized VPA (0.126–2.5 mg/mL), paclitaxel (PTX; 3 μg/mL), or their combinations for 30 min under pressurized conditions. Outcomes included cytotoxicity (CASY cell counting), metabolic activity (MTT assay), cell migration and wound healing (scratch assays), and adhesion to extracellular matrix proteins. Results VPA alone exerted only modest, delayed, and largely concentration-independent antiproliferative effects, with no clear dose–response relationship across the tested range. Metabolic inhibition emerged at concentrations ≥1.5 mg/mL and became profound at ≥2 mg/mL. VPA concentration dependently inhibited cancer cell migration and adhesion to all ECM substrates tested. However, VPA also completely prevented wound closure in normal fibroblasts and mesothelial cells at concentrations as low as 0.252 mg/mL. Combining VPA (1.5 mg/mL) with PTX (3 μg/mL) did not significantly exceed the activity of PTX alone in cytotoxicity (p=0.76) or metabolic assays (p=0.89), with no consistent synergy observed under the fixed-dose conditions tested. Conclusions Although VPA delivered via PIPAC inhibits selected gastric cancer hallmarks, its antiproliferative activity is weak in MKN-45 cells, and the concentrations required for antitumor effects are substantially higher than clinically achievable serum levels. Importantly, VPA impairs wound healing in normal peritoneal-relevant cells, challenging its proposed utility as a recurrence-preventing agent that spares the healing peritoneum. The VPA–PTX combination did not show consistent synergy, and further studies with additional gastric cancer cell lines and in vivo models are warranted.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Pleura and Peritoneum
Published
2026-11-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1515/pp-2026-0018
Primary Topic
Intraperitoneal and Appendiceal Malignancies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
NOV
article

Valproic acid inhibits gastric cancer cell hallmarks but impairs wound healing in a PIPAC-inspired in vitro model

Alfred Königsrainer, Marc Andre Reymond, Frank‐Jürgen Weinreich, Wiebke Solaß et al.
Pleura and Peritoneum
Intraperitoneal and Appendiceal Malignancies
article

Valproic acid inhibits gastric cancer cell hallmarks but impairs wound healing in a PIPAC-inspired in vitro model

Alfred Königsrainer, Marc Andre Reymond, Frank‐Jürgen Weinreich, Wiebke Solaß, Lisa Bräuer
article en

Abstract

Abstract Objectives Valproic acid (VPA), a histone deacetylase inhibitor, has been proposed for pressurized intraperitoneal aerosol chemotherapy (PIPAC) to prevent peritoneal recurrence of gastric cancer while theoretically sparing wound healing. We tested this hypothesis using a PIPAC-inspired in vitro model. Methods MKN-45 gastric cancer cells, neonatal human dermal fibroblasts (NHDF), and mesothelial cells (MeT-5A) were exposed to aerosolized VPA (0.126–2.5 mg/mL), paclitaxel (PTX; 3 μg/mL), or their combinations for 30 min under pressurized conditions. Outcomes included cytotoxicity (CASY cell counting), metabolic activity (MTT assay), cell migration and wound healing (scratch assays), and adhesion to extracellular matrix proteins. Results VPA alone exerted only modest, delayed, and largely concentration-independent antiproliferative effects, with no clear dose–response relationship across the tested range. Metabolic inhibition emerged at concentrations ≥1.5 mg/mL and became profound at ≥2 mg/mL. VPA concentration dependently inhibited cancer cell migration and adhesion to all ECM substrates tested. However, VPA also completely prevented wound closure in normal fibroblasts and mesothelial cells at concentrations as low as 0.252 mg/mL. Combining VPA (1.5 mg/mL) with PTX (3 μg/mL) did not significantly exceed the activity of PTX alone in cytotoxicity (p=0.76) or metabolic assays (p=0.89), with no consistent synergy observed under the fixed-dose conditions tested. Conclusions Although VPA delivered via PIPAC inhibits selected gastric cancer hallmarks, its antiproliferative activity is weak in MKN-45 cells, and the concentrations required for antitumor effects are substantially higher than clinically achievable serum levels. Importantly, VPA impairs wound healing in normal peritoneal-relevant cells, challenging its proposed utility as a recurrence-preventing agent that spares the healing peritoneum. The VPA–PTX combination did not show consistent synergy, and further studies with additional gastric cancer cell lines and in vivo models are warranted.

Pleura and Peritoneum
University of Bern (CH), University of Tübingen (DE)
Intraperitoneal and Appendiceal Malignancies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon