Two White Blocks: Why Fig. 17 and Fig. 171 Were Never Really Assembled

Two White Blocks: Why Fig. 17 and Fig. 171 Were Never Really Assembled This paper proves that Fig. 17 and Fig. 171 in Freese's collection are not successful dissections, but drawn dissections. Area equality wh = s^2 guarantees only equal area, not congruent pieces. Fig. 17 attempts a cut of 2 green + 2 blue strips but leaves a white hole in B. The two remaining small white blocks do not match: M white width = 0.793, B white width = 2.249, difference = 1.456. Fig. 171 does not even attempt a cut — it shows only two white frames, M white a x b, ABCD, and B white s x s, EFGH. The cut line in M should be sqrt(a^2 + (b-a)^2) = 1.211, not s = 1.166, difference = 0.045. The P-template cannot cut M and B at the same time, because its base, height and side cannot satisfy all three equations at once. This is the first measurement-based verification that measures the figures all the way down to the cut line. Author: Brett LinCorrespondence: via Zenodo recordKeywords: dissection, Fig. 17, Fig. 171, P-template, Freese

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2026-11-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.24121821
Primary Topic
Mathematics and Applications
Type
preprint
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
NOV
preprint

Two White Blocks: Why Fig. 17 and Fig. 171 Were Never Really Assembled

Xu Brett Lin
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Mathematics and Applications
preprint

Two White Blocks: Why Fig. 17 and Fig. 171 Were Never Really Assembled

Xu Brett Lin
preprint en

Abstract

Two White Blocks: Why Fig. 17 and Fig. 171 Were Never Really Assembled This paper proves that Fig. 17 and Fig. 171 in Freese's collection are not successful dissections, but drawn dissections. Area equality wh = s^2 guarantees only equal area, not congruent pieces. Fig. 17 attempts a cut of 2 green + 2 blue strips but leaves a white hole in B. The two remaining small white blocks do not match: M white width = 0.793, B white width = 2.249, difference = 1.456. Fig. 171 does not even attempt a cut — it shows only two white frames, M white a x b, ABCD, and B white s x s, EFGH. The cut line in M should be sqrt(a^2 + (b-a)^2) = 1.211, not s = 1.166, difference = 0.045. The P-template cannot cut M and B at the same time, because its base, height and side cannot satisfy all three equations at once. This is the first measurement-based verification that measures the figures all the way down to the cut line. Author: Brett LinCorrespondence: via Zenodo recordKeywords: dissection, Fig. 17, Fig. 171, P-template, Freese

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Mathematics and Applications
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon
Two White Blocks: Why Fig. 17 and Fig. 171 Were Never Really Assembled — Xu Brett Lin · Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS