Charcoal Kiln Yields Compared from Stated Assumptions: A Saleable-Yield Bound for Earth-Mound, Brick, and Metal Retort Kilns

This study compares three charcoal-making methods — the earth-mound kiln, the brick kiln, and the sealed metal retort — on a single accounting basis, so that their yields can be compared without mixing definitions. All results are simulated, not measured. Starting from 1 kg of oven-dry wood with a lower heating value of 19.0 MJ/kg, and applying stated gross solid fractions, stated fines fractions, and stated fractions of unburned brands for each method, the saleable mass yields are 0.192 kg of charcoal per kg of wood for the earth mound, 0.2848 kg/kg for the brick kiln, and 0.3534 kg/kg for the metal retort. The corresponding wood requirements are 5.208, 3.511, and 2.830 kg of oven-dry wood per kg of charcoal, and the fractions of the wood energy retained in the saleable charcoal are 0.288, 0.4422, and 0.5673. A maker who sizes a burn on the central yield and is then met with the low yield in the stated range will be short of wood: for 1000 kg of saleable charcoal the prudent, low-yield wood order is 6250.0 kg for an earth mound, 4012.8 kg for a brick kiln, and 3162.6 kg for a retort, against central estimates of 5208.3, 3511.2, and 2829.7 kg. The practical contribution is the separation itself: much of the apparent disagreement between published kiln yields disappears once fines and unburned brands are counted the same way for every method.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2026-11-10
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.24114289
Primary Topic
Thermochemical Biomass Conversion Processes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
NOV
article

Charcoal Kiln Yields Compared from Stated Assumptions: A Saleable-Yield Bound for Earth-Mound, Brick, and Metal Retort Kilns

William Alexander Aldred
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Thermochemical Biomass Conversion Processes
article

Charcoal Kiln Yields Compared from Stated Assumptions: A Saleable-Yield Bound for Earth-Mound, Brick, and Metal Retort Kilns

William Alexander Aldred
article en

Abstract

This study compares three charcoal-making methods — the earth-mound kiln, the brick kiln, and the sealed metal retort — on a single accounting basis, so that their yields can be compared without mixing definitions. All results are simulated, not measured. Starting from 1 kg of oven-dry wood with a lower heating value of 19.0 MJ/kg, and applying stated gross solid fractions, stated fines fractions, and stated fractions of unburned brands for each method, the saleable mass yields are 0.192 kg of charcoal per kg of wood for the earth mound, 0.2848 kg/kg for the brick kiln, and 0.3534 kg/kg for the metal retort. The corresponding wood requirements are 5.208, 3.511, and 2.830 kg of oven-dry wood per kg of charcoal, and the fractions of the wood energy retained in the saleable charcoal are 0.288, 0.4422, and 0.5673. A maker who sizes a burn on the central yield and is then met with the low yield in the stated range will be short of wood: for 1000 kg of saleable charcoal the prudent, low-yield wood order is 6250.0 kg for an earth mound, 4012.8 kg for a brick kiln, and 3162.6 kg for a retort, against central estimates of 5208.3, 3511.2, and 2829.7 kg. The practical contribution is the separation itself: much of the apparent disagreement between published kiln yields disappears once fines and unburned brands are counted the same way for every method.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Thermochemical Biomass Conversion Processes
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon