EMBEDDING AUTHENTIC ASSESSMENT IN AR-BASED CIVIC EDUCATION

This study proposes the Embedded Authentic Assessment framework for AR-Based Civic Education integrated with Project Citizen. The framework’s three evidence domains (cognitive, affective, and participatory) were specified a priori from civic education theory; the article uses classroom evidence to examine how each domain was realised in practice. The article reports a secondary analysis of evidence generated during a three-week implementation involving 27 Grade IX students from three public junior high schools in Bandung, Indonesia: SMPN 2 Bandung, SMPN 12 Bandung, and SMPN 30 Bandung, with nine students from each school. The evidence base comprised 27 student interviews, narrative reflections, classroom observations, four-panel portfolios, and action plans. Thematic analysis of the qualitative corpus identified recurring evidence of empathy, tolerance, value-oriented reflection, deliberative participation, collaboration, and civic action readiness. These findings suggest that AR can provide a contextual and immersive learning environment, while Project Citizen and reflective and performance activities generate complementary forms of assessment evidence throughout the learning process. Because the study involved a limited single-group implementation and the present article is a secondary analysis, the findings should not be interpreted as causal validation of AR or Project Citizen. The Embedded Authentic Assessment framework is therefore presented as a theory-derived, data-informed conceptual proposal that requires further validation across larger and more diverse contexts.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
F1000Research
Published
2026-11-10
DOI
https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.179757.3
Primary Topic
Student Assessment and Feedback
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
NOV
article

EMBEDDING AUTHENTIC ASSESSMENT IN AR-BASED CIVIC EDUCATION

Iim Siti Masyitoh, Restu Adi Nugraha, Elda Dwi Pratiwi, Aldiska Adelina Fitri et al.
F1000Research
Student Assessment and Feedback
article

EMBEDDING AUTHENTIC ASSESSMENT IN AR-BASED CIVIC EDUCATION

Iim Siti Masyitoh, Restu Adi Nugraha, Elda Dwi Pratiwi, Aldiska Adelina Fitri, Istifadah Istifadah, R. Rahmat
article en

Abstract

This study proposes the Embedded Authentic Assessment framework for AR-Based Civic Education integrated with Project Citizen. The framework’s three evidence domains (cognitive, affective, and participatory) were specified a priori from civic education theory; the article uses classroom evidence to examine how each domain was realised in practice. The article reports a secondary analysis of evidence generated during a three-week implementation involving 27 Grade IX students from three public junior high schools in Bandung, Indonesia: SMPN 2 Bandung, SMPN 12 Bandung, and SMPN 30 Bandung, with nine students from each school. The evidence base comprised 27 student interviews, narrative reflections, classroom observations, four-panel portfolios, and action plans. Thematic analysis of the qualitative corpus identified recurring evidence of empathy, tolerance, value-oriented reflection, deliberative participation, collaboration, and civic action readiness. These findings suggest that AR can provide a contextual and immersive learning environment, while Project Citizen and reflective and performance activities generate complementary forms of assessment evidence throughout the learning process. Because the study involved a limited single-group implementation and the present article is a secondary analysis, the findings should not be interpreted as causal validation of AR or Project Citizen. The Embedded Authentic Assessment framework is therefore presented as a theory-derived, data-informed conceptual proposal that requires further validation across larger and more diverse contexts.

F1000ResearchVol. 15
Indonesia University of Education (ID), University of Wisconsin–Madison (US)
Student Assessment and Feedback
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon