Contrast-enhanced mammography findings of idiopathic granulomatous mastitis: a retrospective analysis of seventy histopathologically proven cases

PURPOSE: This study aimed to characterize the contrast-enhanced mammography (CEM) findings of histopathologically confirmed idiopathic granulomatous mastitis (IGM), compare isolated mass and non-mass enhancement (NME) phenotypes, and explore the cumulative burden of malignancy-mimicking imaging features using an exploratory malignancy-mimicking feature score (MMFS). METHODS: This retrospective single-center study included 70 women with histopathologically confirmed IGM who underwent CEM between 2021 and 2024. Imaging findings were reviewed in consensus by two breast radiologists according to the Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System Manual (2025 edition). Lesion morphology, enhancement characteristics, temporal enhancement patterns, conspicuity, and associated imaging findings were recorded. Patients with isolated mass lesions and isolated NMEs were compared. The MMFS was calculated from 12 predefined malignancy-mimicking CEM features, including moderate/high enhancement conspicuity, plateau/washout temporal enhancement patterns, suspicious mass morphology, segmental/linear NME distribution, and associated findings, such as skin thickening and axillary lymphadenopathy. RESULTS: = 0.004). The mean MMFS was 3.41 ± 1.66. All patients demonstrated at least one malignancy-mimicking imaging feature; 90.0% had two or more features, and 65.7% had three or more features. CONCLUSION: IGM demonstrates a broad spectrum of CEM findings, including multiple imaging features conventionally considered suspicious for malignancy. NME is the predominant imaging phenotype and is associated with larger lesion size and more frequent skin thickening than isolated mass lesions. The high cumulative burden of malignancy-mimicking imaging features highlights the diagnostic challenge posed by IGM on CEM. CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE: IGM frequently mimics breast cancer on CEM because multiple suspicious imaging features often coexist within the same lesion. Familiarity with the CEM spectrum of IGM may facilitate the appropriate interpretation of suspicious findings and contribute to informed patient management.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology
Published
2026-11-10
DOI
https://doi.org/10.4274/dir.2026.264367
Primary Topic
Breast Lesions and Carcinomas
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
NOV
article

Contrast-enhanced mammography findings of idiopathic granulomatous mastitis: a retrospective analysis of seventy histopathologically proven cases

Teoman Coşkun, Şebnem Örgüç, Ahmet Burak Kale, Hanife Seda Mavili et al.
Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology
Breast Lesions and Carcinomas
article

Contrast-enhanced mammography findings of idiopathic granulomatous mastitis: a retrospective analysis of seventy histopathologically proven cases

Teoman Coşkun, Şebnem Örgüç, Ahmet Burak Kale, Hanife Seda Mavili, Dilşah Oral
article en

Abstract

PURPOSE: This study aimed to characterize the contrast-enhanced mammography (CEM) findings of histopathologically confirmed idiopathic granulomatous mastitis (IGM), compare isolated mass and non-mass enhancement (NME) phenotypes, and explore the cumulative burden of malignancy-mimicking imaging features using an exploratory malignancy-mimicking feature score (MMFS). METHODS: This retrospective single-center study included 70 women with histopathologically confirmed IGM who underwent CEM between 2021 and 2024. Imaging findings were reviewed in consensus by two breast radiologists according to the Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System Manual (2025 edition). Lesion morphology, enhancement characteristics, temporal enhancement patterns, conspicuity, and associated imaging findings were recorded. Patients with isolated mass lesions and isolated NMEs were compared. The MMFS was calculated from 12 predefined malignancy-mimicking CEM features, including moderate/high enhancement conspicuity, plateau/washout temporal enhancement patterns, suspicious mass morphology, segmental/linear NME distribution, and associated findings, such as skin thickening and axillary lymphadenopathy. RESULTS: = 0.004). The mean MMFS was 3.41 ± 1.66. All patients demonstrated at least one malignancy-mimicking imaging feature; 90.0% had two or more features, and 65.7% had three or more features. CONCLUSION: IGM demonstrates a broad spectrum of CEM findings, including multiple imaging features conventionally considered suspicious for malignancy. NME is the predominant imaging phenotype and is associated with larger lesion size and more frequent skin thickening than isolated mass lesions. The high cumulative burden of malignancy-mimicking imaging features highlights the diagnostic challenge posed by IGM on CEM. CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE: IGM frequently mimics breast cancer on CEM because multiple suspicious imaging features often coexist within the same lesion. Familiarity with the CEM spectrum of IGM may facilitate the appropriate interpretation of suspicious findings and contribute to informed patient management.

Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology
Manisa Celal Bayar University (TR)
Breast Lesions and Carcinomas
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon