Precision medicine for depression: development of a decision-support tool based on the PRIME randomized controlled trial

Abstract Many patients with major depressive disorder (MDD) do not respond to their first antidepressant, and clinicians lack an empirical basis for deciding whether to continue or change treatment after an initial trial. We analysed the Precision Medicine in Mental Health Care (PRIME) pragmatic randomized controlled trial, in which 1,944 US veterans were randomized to usual care enhanced by pharmacogenetic testing or to usual care alone. Using decision tree analysis in the 1,307 participants who had not responded after four weeks, four characteristics separated those with the highest (39.9±10.5%) and the lowest (11.1±3.0%) likelihood of week-12 treatment response: symptom improvement at week 4, better physical health, availability of pharmacogenetic test results, and absence of post-traumatic stress disorder. The resulting decision-support tool identified 77% of week-4 partial and non-responders as candidates for a treatment change. This preliminary tool requires validation in independent samples before prospective clinical evaluation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Research Square
Published
2026-11-10
DOI
https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-11407094/v1
Primary Topic
Treatment of Major Depression
Type
preprint
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
NOV
preprint

Precision medicine for depression: development of a decision-support tool based on the PRIME randomized controlled trial

Daniel M. Blumberger, Benoit H. Mulsant, Stefan M. Kloiber, Eric J. Lenze et al.
Research Square
Treatment of Major Depression
preprint

Precision medicine for depression: development of a decision-support tool based on the PRIME randomized controlled trial

Daniel M. Blumberger, Benoit H. Mulsant, Stefan M. Kloiber, Eric J. Lenze, Muhammad Ishrat Husain, Helena Kyunghee Kim, Daniel Müller, David Oslin
preprint en

Abstract

Abstract Many patients with major depressive disorder (MDD) do not respond to their first antidepressant, and clinicians lack an empirical basis for deciding whether to continue or change treatment after an initial trial. We analysed the Precision Medicine in Mental Health Care (PRIME) pragmatic randomized controlled trial, in which 1,944 US veterans were randomized to usual care enhanced by pharmacogenetic testing or to usual care alone. Using decision tree analysis in the 1,307 participants who had not responded after four weeks, four characteristics separated those with the highest (39.9±10.5%) and the lowest (11.1±3.0%) likelihood of week-12 treatment response: symptom improvement at week 4, better physical health, availability of pharmacogenetic test results, and absence of post-traumatic stress disorder. The resulting decision-support tool identified 77% of week-4 partial and non-responders as candidates for a treatment change. This preliminary tool requires validation in independent samples before prospective clinical evaluation.

Research Square
University Health Network (CA), Centre for Addiction and Mental Health (CA), University of Toronto (CA), Washington University in St. Louis (US), Ontario Shores Centre for Mental Health Sciences (CA), University of Pennsylvania (US)
Treatment of Major Depression
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon