The Correctness Tax: Redundancy Energy at Exascale and Beyond

As a computing system grows, its mean time between failures falls as 1/N while long computations do not shorten, so correctness becomes an energy line-item. Using the standard Young/Daly checkpoint model with published-order inputs (per-component failure rate 1000 FIT, sensitivity 200-5000 FIT; 12 GB checkpoint state per component; global checkpoint 600 s; local multilevel checkpoint 60 s), this paper computes system MTBF, the optimal checkpoint interval, and the fraction of total machine energy spent on correctness for N = 1e5 to 1e8 components under three strategies. At 1e5 components (25 MW, comparable to Frontier's published 22 MW) the tax is 16.61% of total energy for global checkpoint/restart and 10.10% for local checkpointing plus algorithm-based fault tolerance at 5% overhead - smaller than folklore claims at current scale. Global checkpointing crosses 50% of total energy at 1.61e6 components; the local strategy crosses 50% at 1.37e7 components; dual modular redundancy costs exactly 50% at every scale and is cheapest beyond those crossings. At 1e8 components the MTBF is 36 s and checkpoint/restart consumes 95.73% (global) or 78.80% (local) of all energy. Model calculations are labelled SIMULATED, NOT MEASURED. The deposit includes the paper PDF and Markdown, the computation script (compute.py) that produces every number in the paper, and its outputs (results.json, results.txt). Computations and drafting were performed with Dave, an AI research system.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2026-11-10
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.24111479
Primary Topic
Distributed systems and fault tolerance
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
NOV
article

The Correctness Tax: Redundancy Energy at Exascale and Beyond

William Alexander Aldred
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Distributed systems and fault tolerance
article

The Correctness Tax: Redundancy Energy at Exascale and Beyond

William Alexander Aldred
article en

Abstract

As a computing system grows, its mean time between failures falls as 1/N while long computations do not shorten, so correctness becomes an energy line-item. Using the standard Young/Daly checkpoint model with published-order inputs (per-component failure rate 1000 FIT, sensitivity 200-5000 FIT; 12 GB checkpoint state per component; global checkpoint 600 s; local multilevel checkpoint 60 s), this paper computes system MTBF, the optimal checkpoint interval, and the fraction of total machine energy spent on correctness for N = 1e5 to 1e8 components under three strategies. At 1e5 components (25 MW, comparable to Frontier's published 22 MW) the tax is 16.61% of total energy for global checkpoint/restart and 10.10% for local checkpointing plus algorithm-based fault tolerance at 5% overhead - smaller than folklore claims at current scale. Global checkpointing crosses 50% of total energy at 1.61e6 components; the local strategy crosses 50% at 1.37e7 components; dual modular redundancy costs exactly 50% at every scale and is cheapest beyond those crossings. At 1e8 components the MTBF is 36 s and checkpoint/restart consumes 95.73% (global) or 78.80% (local) of all energy. Model calculations are labelled SIMULATED, NOT MEASURED. The deposit includes the paper PDF and Markdown, the computation script (compute.py) that produces every number in the paper, and its outputs (results.json, results.txt). Computations and drafting were performed with Dave, an AI research system.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Distributed systems and fault tolerance
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon