Association of GBP2 and GBP5 expression with COVID-19 severity: a retrospective cross-sectional study

Abstract Background Host interferon responses are increasingly recognized as determinants of COVID-19 outcomes. Guanylate-binding proteins (GBPs) are interferon-stimulated GTPases that restrict SARS-CoV-2 by interfering with furin-mediated processing of the viral spike protein; however, their relationship with clinical severity in patients has not been extensively studied. This study evaluated the association between GBP2 and GBP5 mRNA expression and clinical severity, with GBP5 as a comparator to test whether any association was gene-specific. Methods In this retrospective, cross-sectional study of archived whole-blood samples collected between November 2020 and February 2021, 150 adults with RT-PCR-confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection (37 mild, 32 moderate, 46 severe, 35 critical, classified per WHO/national criteria) and 50 SARS-CoV-2-negative controls were assayed for GBP2 and GBP5 mRNA by qRT-PCR, normalized to GAPDH (2 − ​ ΔΔCt method). Groups were compared using one-way ANOVA with Tukey post-hoc testing, with variance-robust and log2-scale sensitivity analyses; age, sex, and comorbidity were assessed by Spearman correlation and regression. Results GBP2 expression differed significantly across the five study groups (F = 288.27, p < 0.001), decreasing stepwise from mild (4.76-fold) to critical (0.60-fold) disease relative to controls. All ten pairwise comparisons were significant on the fold-change scale; on the log2 scale nine were significant with Tukey HSD (mild versus moderate, p = 0.205) and all ten with Games–Howell. GBP2 was inversely correlated with age ( r = − 0.57, p < 0.001), but clinical severity remained an independent predictor after adjustment ( p < 0.001 for each severity group). Sex and comorbidity were not independently associated, and age reached significance on the log2 scale only (conventional p = 0.045; HC3 p = 0.020). GBP5 differed far less across groups (F = 3.31, p = 0.012), with higher expression in critical patients than controls (1.35-fold vs. 1.00-fold) and no graded pattern. The crude association between low GBP2 and mortality was no longer detectable after adjusting for severity. Conclusions GBP2 expression was inversely associated with COVID-19 severity in this cohort, showing a strong graded relationship across severity strata, whereas GBP5 showed a much weaker and non-graded pattern. As only these two interferon-stimulated genes were measured, no inferences can be drawn about such genes in general. These findings describe an observed cross-sectional association, not a causal one, and warrant confirmation in prospective multicenter studies.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
BMC Infectious Diseases
Published
2026-11-10
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12879-026-14793-3
Primary Topic
interferon and immune responses
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
NOV
article

Association of GBP2 and GBP5 expression with COVID-19 severity: a retrospective cross-sectional study

Bahadır Feyzioğlu, Abdullah Yücel Baba
BMC Infectious Diseases
interferon and immune responses
article

Association of GBP2 and GBP5 expression with COVID-19 severity: a retrospective cross-sectional study

Bahadır Feyzioğlu, Abdullah Yücel Baba
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background Host interferon responses are increasingly recognized as determinants of COVID-19 outcomes. Guanylate-binding proteins (GBPs) are interferon-stimulated GTPases that restrict SARS-CoV-2 by interfering with furin-mediated processing of the viral spike protein; however, their relationship with clinical severity in patients has not been extensively studied. This study evaluated the association between GBP2 and GBP5 mRNA expression and clinical severity, with GBP5 as a comparator to test whether any association was gene-specific. Methods In this retrospective, cross-sectional study of archived whole-blood samples collected between November 2020 and February 2021, 150 adults with RT-PCR-confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection (37 mild, 32 moderate, 46 severe, 35 critical, classified per WHO/national criteria) and 50 SARS-CoV-2-negative controls were assayed for GBP2 and GBP5 mRNA by qRT-PCR, normalized to GAPDH (2 − ​ ΔΔCt method). Groups were compared using one-way ANOVA with Tukey post-hoc testing, with variance-robust and log2-scale sensitivity analyses; age, sex, and comorbidity were assessed by Spearman correlation and regression. Results GBP2 expression differed significantly across the five study groups (F = 288.27, p < 0.001), decreasing stepwise from mild (4.76-fold) to critical (0.60-fold) disease relative to controls. All ten pairwise comparisons were significant on the fold-change scale; on the log2 scale nine were significant with Tukey HSD (mild versus moderate, p = 0.205) and all ten with Games–Howell. GBP2 was inversely correlated with age ( r = − 0.57, p < 0.001), but clinical severity remained an independent predictor after adjustment ( p < 0.001 for each severity group). Sex and comorbidity were not independently associated, and age reached significance on the log2 scale only (conventional p = 0.045; HC3 p = 0.020). GBP5 differed far less across groups (F = 3.31, p = 0.012), with higher expression in critical patients than controls (1.35-fold vs. 1.00-fold) and no graded pattern. The crude association between low GBP2 and mortality was no longer detectable after adjusting for severity. Conclusions GBP2 expression was inversely associated with COVID-19 severity in this cohort, showing a strong graded relationship across severity strata, whereas GBP5 showed a much weaker and non-graded pattern. As only these two interferon-stimulated genes were measured, no inferences can be drawn about such genes in general. These findings describe an observed cross-sectional association, not a causal one, and warrant confirmation in prospective multicenter studies.

BMC Infectious Diseases
Karabük University (TR), Necmettin Erbakan University (TR)
interferon and immune responses
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon