A wick selection rule for tallow and beeswax candles

A candle fails in two opposite ways. If the wick is too small for the candle, its flame melts only a narrow well in the centre, the walls never melt, and the flame sinks into a tunnel of its own making. If the wick is too large, its flame melts a pool wider than the candle, the liquid overflows, the flame is fed faster than it can burn cleanly, and the candle smokes and drips. This paper states a heat-balance model that predicts melt-pool diameter from wick burn rate and wax properties, converts that prediction into a selection rule with computed failure bounds on both sides, and tabulates the rule for tallow and for beeswax. The energy needed to melt a kilogram of wax, at 20 °C ambient, is 234.0 kJ/kg for tallow and 280.0 kJ/kg for beeswax, a ratio of 1.197. At the same wick class, W3 at 7.0 g/h, the predicted pool is 36.9 mm in tallow and 29.8 mm in beeswax, a reduction of 19.2%. The practical consequence is that a wick chart for one wax does not transfer to the other: a 50 mm candle is correctly served by W4 in tallow but needs W5 in beeswax, and candles of 20 mm in tallow and 80 mm in either wax fall outside the five classes considered altogether. All results are model calculations. SIMULATED, NOT MEASURED.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2026-11-10
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.24115258
Primary Topic
Fire dynamics and safety research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
NOV
article

A wick selection rule for tallow and beeswax candles

William Alexander Aldred
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Fire dynamics and safety research
article

A wick selection rule for tallow and beeswax candles

William Alexander Aldred
article en

Abstract

A candle fails in two opposite ways. If the wick is too small for the candle, its flame melts only a narrow well in the centre, the walls never melt, and the flame sinks into a tunnel of its own making. If the wick is too large, its flame melts a pool wider than the candle, the liquid overflows, the flame is fed faster than it can burn cleanly, and the candle smokes and drips. This paper states a heat-balance model that predicts melt-pool diameter from wick burn rate and wax properties, converts that prediction into a selection rule with computed failure bounds on both sides, and tabulates the rule for tallow and for beeswax. The energy needed to melt a kilogram of wax, at 20 °C ambient, is 234.0 kJ/kg for tallow and 280.0 kJ/kg for beeswax, a ratio of 1.197. At the same wick class, W3 at 7.0 g/h, the predicted pool is 36.9 mm in tallow and 29.8 mm in beeswax, a reduction of 19.2%. The practical consequence is that a wick chart for one wax does not transfer to the other: a 50 mm candle is correctly served by W4 in tallow but needs W5 in beeswax, and candles of 20 mm in tallow and 80 mm in either wax fall outside the five classes considered altogether. All results are model calculations. SIMULATED, NOT MEASURED.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Fire dynamics and safety research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon