MR-proANP, but Not Copeptin, Predicts Cardiovascular Events and Mortality in Type 1 Diabetes: A Prospective Cohort Study

Background/Objectives: MR-proANP and copeptin are biomarkers of cardiovascular stress and individuals with type 1 diabetes are at increased cardiovascular risk. We aimed to investigate the associations of MR-proANP and copeptin with major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs) and all-cause mortality in individuals with type 1 diabetes and in controls. Methods: MR-proANP and copeptin were measured in 576 individuals with type 1 diabetes and 513 controls enrolled in the LeDIG cohort. Participants were followed for a median of 10.7 and 10.2 years, respectively. Major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs) and all-cause mortality were ascertained through linkage to the national Cause of Death and Inpatient Registries. Associations with outcomes were evaluated using Cox proportional hazards regression with adjustment for established cardiovascular risk factors. Non-linear associations were assessed using restricted cubic splines, and Kaplan–Meier analyses were performed across tertiles of MR-proANP. Results: In type 1 diabetes, higher MR-proANP levels were independently associated with increased risk of both MACE (HR 1.005, 95% CI 1.001–1.009; p = 0.010) and all-cause mortality (HR 1.008, 95% CI 1.003–1.012; p < 0.001) after multivariable adjustment. Individuals with type 1 diabetes had higher risks of MACE (HR 2.22, 95% CI 1.41–3.50; p < 0.001) and all-cause mortality (HR 4.36, 95% CI 2.13–8.90; p < 0.001) compared with controls. The association with MACE was attenuated and became statistically nonsignificant after additional adjustment for previous myocardial infarction or stroke (p = 0.086), but remained significant after exclusion of such individuals. Copeptin was not independently associated with outcomes after adjustment. In controls, MR-proANP was associated with mortality but not MACE. Conclusions: MR-proANP was independently associated with long-term risk of cardiovascular events and all-cause mortality in individuals with type 1 diabetes. MR-proANP may reflect established cardiovascular disease but also be associated with future cardiovascular risk in individuals without previous events. In contrast, copeptin was not independently associated with these outcomes.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Clinical Medicine
Published
2026-11-10
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm15228766
Primary Topic
Diabetes Management and Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
NOV
article

MR-proANP, but Not Copeptin, Predicts Cardiovascular Events and Mortality in Type 1 Diabetes: A Prospective Cohort Study

Simona I. Chisalita, Emilia Gauffin, Hans J. Arnqvist, Emma Paulsson
Journal of Clinical Medicine
Diabetes Management and Research
article

MR-proANP, but Not Copeptin, Predicts Cardiovascular Events and Mortality in Type 1 Diabetes: A Prospective Cohort Study

Simona I. Chisalita, Emilia Gauffin, Hans J. Arnqvist, Emma Paulsson
article en

Abstract

Background/Objectives: MR-proANP and copeptin are biomarkers of cardiovascular stress and individuals with type 1 diabetes are at increased cardiovascular risk. We aimed to investigate the associations of MR-proANP and copeptin with major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs) and all-cause mortality in individuals with type 1 diabetes and in controls. Methods: MR-proANP and copeptin were measured in 576 individuals with type 1 diabetes and 513 controls enrolled in the LeDIG cohort. Participants were followed for a median of 10.7 and 10.2 years, respectively. Major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs) and all-cause mortality were ascertained through linkage to the national Cause of Death and Inpatient Registries. Associations with outcomes were evaluated using Cox proportional hazards regression with adjustment for established cardiovascular risk factors. Non-linear associations were assessed using restricted cubic splines, and Kaplan–Meier analyses were performed across tertiles of MR-proANP. Results: In type 1 diabetes, higher MR-proANP levels were independently associated with increased risk of both MACE (HR 1.005, 95% CI 1.001–1.009; p = 0.010) and all-cause mortality (HR 1.008, 95% CI 1.003–1.012; p < 0.001) after multivariable adjustment. Individuals with type 1 diabetes had higher risks of MACE (HR 2.22, 95% CI 1.41–3.50; p < 0.001) and all-cause mortality (HR 4.36, 95% CI 2.13–8.90; p < 0.001) compared with controls. The association with MACE was attenuated and became statistically nonsignificant after additional adjustment for previous myocardial infarction or stroke (p = 0.086), but remained significant after exclusion of such individuals. Copeptin was not independently associated with outcomes after adjustment. In controls, MR-proANP was associated with mortality but not MACE. Conclusions: MR-proANP was independently associated with long-term risk of cardiovascular events and all-cause mortality in individuals with type 1 diabetes. MR-proANP may reflect established cardiovascular disease but also be associated with future cardiovascular risk in individuals without previous events. In contrast, copeptin was not independently associated with these outcomes.

Journal of Clinical MedicineVol. 15(22)
Linköping University (SE), Region Östergötland (SE)
Diabetes Management and Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon