Administrative Sanction Enforcement Innovations For Legal Compliance And Citizen Rights Restoration

General Background Administrative penalties serve as a crucial instrument for ensuring legal obedience and strengthening governance accountability within a rule of law framework. Specific Background In Indonesia, the regulatory framework governing these public measures is heavily fragmented across various statutory laws, leading to unclear lines of responsibility and inconsistent execution. Knowledge Gap Current legal execution often fails to bridge the gap between issuing formal penalty decisions and practically executing corrective measures or recovering affected public entitlements. Aims This study examines the statutory framework governing penalty execution and formulates a reconstruction model prioritizing measurable obedience and government accountability. Results Findings reveal that the Indonesian Ombudsman reported 23,596 public complaints in 2025, underscoring the urgent need for a cohesive documentation system; successful penalty execution necessitates integrating violation identification, responsibility attribution, proportionate penalty imposition, and strict monitoring. Novelty This research integrates penalty imposition, performance tracking, and public entitlement recovery into a single, cohesive analytical model rather than solely advocating for heavier punishments. Implications Future statutory reform must prioritize coordinated inter-agency oversight and digitized documentation systems to ensure corrective measures translate into tangible protection for society. Highlights Regulatory fragmentation across various Indonesian public service laws weakens penalty execution. A measurable oversight model requires integrating violation identification with corrective monitoring. Coordinated inter-agency coordination and digitized documentation systems secure tangible governance accountability. Keywords Government Accountability; Penalty Execution; Public Service Oversight; Regulatory Fragmentation; Corrective Monitoring

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Indonesian Journal of Innovation Studies
Published
2026-11-10
DOI
https://doi.org/10.21070/ijins.v28i1.2458
Primary Topic
Indonesian Legal and Regulatory Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
NOV
article

Administrative Sanction Enforcement Innovations For Legal Compliance And Citizen Rights Restoration

Muti Arta Simamora, Nabila Aprillia, M. Yusniza, Oktris Damayanti Nainggolan
Indonesian Journal of Innovation Studies
Indonesian Legal and Regulatory Studies
article

Administrative Sanction Enforcement Innovations For Legal Compliance And Citizen Rights Restoration

Muti Arta Simamora, Nabila Aprillia, M. Yusniza, Oktris Damayanti Nainggolan
article en

Abstract

General Background Administrative penalties serve as a crucial instrument for ensuring legal obedience and strengthening governance accountability within a rule of law framework. Specific Background In Indonesia, the regulatory framework governing these public measures is heavily fragmented across various statutory laws, leading to unclear lines of responsibility and inconsistent execution. Knowledge Gap Current legal execution often fails to bridge the gap between issuing formal penalty decisions and practically executing corrective measures or recovering affected public entitlements. Aims This study examines the statutory framework governing penalty execution and formulates a reconstruction model prioritizing measurable obedience and government accountability. Results Findings reveal that the Indonesian Ombudsman reported 23,596 public complaints in 2025, underscoring the urgent need for a cohesive documentation system; successful penalty execution necessitates integrating violation identification, responsibility attribution, proportionate penalty imposition, and strict monitoring. Novelty This research integrates penalty imposition, performance tracking, and public entitlement recovery into a single, cohesive analytical model rather than solely advocating for heavier punishments. Implications Future statutory reform must prioritize coordinated inter-agency oversight and digitized documentation systems to ensure corrective measures translate into tangible protection for society. Highlights Regulatory fragmentation across various Indonesian public service laws weakens penalty execution. A measurable oversight model requires integrating violation identification with corrective monitoring. Coordinated inter-agency coordination and digitized documentation systems secure tangible governance accountability. Keywords Government Accountability; Penalty Execution; Public Service Oversight; Regulatory Fragmentation; Corrective Monitoring

Indonesian Journal of Innovation StudiesVol. 28(1)
Universitas Maritim Raja Ali Haji (ID)
Indonesian Legal and Regulatory Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon