How Dominant Conceptualizations of Leadership and Identity Have Shaped the Research on Women in Educational Administration Over Time: A Descriptive Review

Women, particularly women of color, are underrepresented in virtually all educational administration positions in the United States. Simultaneously, dominant discourses persist upholding masculinity and Whiteness in educational administration and highly ranked and influential journals, thus limiting who has access to, and can thrive in, leadership. With nearly 40 years since the last review on women and other minoritized identities in educational administration, this descriptive review traced the research on women in educational administration in the United States in dominant journals from 1 year before the review by Yeakey et al. review until 2023 and yielded 89 studies. Key findings from the reviewed corpus include (a) small, slightly growing scholarship on women in educational administration, (b) disrupted use of critical frameworks and limited challenges to dominant discourses in administration, (c) few studies including other marginalized and/or minoritized identities or extending past the gender binary with the exception of increased scholarship on African American/Black women leadership, and (d) the persistence of discriminatory systems, creating barriers for women, especially women of color, in leadership.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Review of Educational Research
Published
2026-11-10
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543261498848
Primary Topic
Educational Leadership and Practices
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
NOV
article

How Dominant Conceptualizations of Leadership and Identity Have Shaped the Research on Women in Educational Administration Over Time: A Descriptive Review

Jennie Miles Weiner, Taylor Strickland
Review of Educational Research
Educational Leadership and Practices
article

How Dominant Conceptualizations of Leadership and Identity Have Shaped the Research on Women in Educational Administration Over Time: A Descriptive Review

Jennie Miles Weiner, Taylor Strickland
article en

Abstract

Women, particularly women of color, are underrepresented in virtually all educational administration positions in the United States. Simultaneously, dominant discourses persist upholding masculinity and Whiteness in educational administration and highly ranked and influential journals, thus limiting who has access to, and can thrive in, leadership. With nearly 40 years since the last review on women and other minoritized identities in educational administration, this descriptive review traced the research on women in educational administration in the United States in dominant journals from 1 year before the review by Yeakey et al. review until 2023 and yielded 89 studies. Key findings from the reviewed corpus include (a) small, slightly growing scholarship on women in educational administration, (b) disrupted use of critical frameworks and limited challenges to dominant discourses in administration, (c) few studies including other marginalized and/or minoritized identities or extending past the gender binary with the exception of increased scholarship on African American/Black women leadership, and (d) the persistence of discriminatory systems, creating barriers for women, especially women of color, in leadership.

Review of Educational Research
University of Connecticut (US)
Educational Leadership and Practices
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon