Enforcement Innovations for Cosmetic Authorization Violations and Consumer Restitution Rights

General Background The rapid growth of the beauty industry has significantly increased public consumption of makeup and skincare, necessitating stringent government oversight to ensure product safety. Specific Background Although the Indonesian Food and Drug Authority (BPOM) implements a mandatory notification system for market approval, recent surveillance reveals a surge in illegal merchandise circulation, particularly concerning post-market ingredient manipulation in contract-manufactured goods. Knowledge Gap While previous research predominantly addresses pre-market product legality and general safety regulations, there is limited analysis regarding post-market composition discrepancies in legally notified items and the subsequent legal recourse for affected buyers. Aims This study analyzes administrative penalties against market approval breaches and evaluates the adequacy of financial recovery frameworks. Results Findings demonstrate that regulatory penalties primarily involve warnings, license revocations, and physical merchandise destruction. However, current protective mechanisms remain insufficient, as regulatory actions do not automatically guarantee financial refunds for buyers of non-compliant goods, leaving a critical void in restorative justice. Novelty This research uniquely correlates post-market regulatory penalties with the practical fulfillment of buyer refund rights regarding legally notified but compositionally altered items. Implications Strengthening regulatory audits on contract manufacturers, integrating notification databases with online trading platforms, and establishing mandatory, transparent refund procedures are urgently required to secure buyer rights and deter the distribution of non-compliant merchandise. Highlights Post-market ingredient manipulation frequently occurs within contract-manufactured beauty goods BPOM penalties primarily involve license revocation alongside dangerous merchandise destruction Mandatory financial refund frameworks remain absent for affected online shoppers Keywords Administrative Law; Market Approval; Buyer Recovery; BPOM Oversight; Notification System

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Indonesian Journal of Innovation Studies
Published
2026-11-10
DOI
https://doi.org/10.21070/ijins.v28i1.2459
Primary Topic
Indonesian Legal and Regulatory Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
NOV
article

Enforcement Innovations for Cosmetic Authorization Violations and Consumer Restitution Rights

Thania Imelda Sevriandri, Naisya Putri Dealova, Widia Haspiani, Chelsha Christy Napitupulu et al.
Indonesian Journal of Innovation Studies
Indonesian Legal and Regulatory Studies
article

Enforcement Innovations for Cosmetic Authorization Violations and Consumer Restitution Rights

Thania Imelda Sevriandri, Naisya Putri Dealova, Widia Haspiani, Chelsha Christy Napitupulu, Kaila Sari, Dela Natalia Siallagan
article en

Abstract

General Background The rapid growth of the beauty industry has significantly increased public consumption of makeup and skincare, necessitating stringent government oversight to ensure product safety. Specific Background Although the Indonesian Food and Drug Authority (BPOM) implements a mandatory notification system for market approval, recent surveillance reveals a surge in illegal merchandise circulation, particularly concerning post-market ingredient manipulation in contract-manufactured goods. Knowledge Gap While previous research predominantly addresses pre-market product legality and general safety regulations, there is limited analysis regarding post-market composition discrepancies in legally notified items and the subsequent legal recourse for affected buyers. Aims This study analyzes administrative penalties against market approval breaches and evaluates the adequacy of financial recovery frameworks. Results Findings demonstrate that regulatory penalties primarily involve warnings, license revocations, and physical merchandise destruction. However, current protective mechanisms remain insufficient, as regulatory actions do not automatically guarantee financial refunds for buyers of non-compliant goods, leaving a critical void in restorative justice. Novelty This research uniquely correlates post-market regulatory penalties with the practical fulfillment of buyer refund rights regarding legally notified but compositionally altered items. Implications Strengthening regulatory audits on contract manufacturers, integrating notification databases with online trading platforms, and establishing mandatory, transparent refund procedures are urgently required to secure buyer rights and deter the distribution of non-compliant merchandise. Highlights Post-market ingredient manipulation frequently occurs within contract-manufactured beauty goods BPOM penalties primarily involve license revocation alongside dangerous merchandise destruction Mandatory financial refund frameworks remain absent for affected online shoppers Keywords Administrative Law; Market Approval; Buyer Recovery; BPOM Oversight; Notification System

Indonesian Journal of Innovation StudiesVol. 28(1)
Universitas Maritim Raja Ali Haji (ID)
Indonesian Legal and Regulatory Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon