Adjunctive role of focal FDG Uptake on PET/CT in assessing thyroid malignancy beyond sonography

Introduction Focal fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) uptake on positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) has been associated with thyroid malignancy. However, its incremental value beyond ultrasonographic risk stratification remains unclear. We evaluated whether focal FDG uptake and the maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax) improve the prediction of malignancy when incorporated into ultrasonographic risk stratification systems. Methods This retrospective cohort study included 464 thyroid nodules from 454 individuals who underwent ultrasonography, biopsy, and PET/CT between 2017 and 2022 at our tertiary referral hospital. PET/CT had been performed for cancer work-up in 96.6% of nodules. Nodules were classified according to the American College of Radiology Thyroid Imaging Reporting and Data System (ACR-TIRADS) and the Korean Thyroid Imaging Reporting and Data System (K-TIRADS). Diagnostic performance was assessed using receiver operating characteristic analysis and the area under the curve (AUC). Incremental value was evaluated using the net reclassification improvement (NRI) and decision curve analysis. Results Among 464 nodules, 221 (47.6%) were malignant. The malignancy rate was higher in nodules with focal FDG uptake than in those without (52.3% vs. 24.4%). Adding focal FDG uptake increased the AUC for both ACR-TIRADS and K-TIRADS; however, the overall NRI was not improved. The absence of focal FDG uptake modestly improved the reclassification of benign nodules (NRI_nonevent = 0.070 for ACR-TIRADS and 0.045 for K-TIRADS). SUVmax was positively associated with malignancy risk without a clear diagnostic cutoff. Incorporating SUVmax improved the AUC and the overall NRI (0.093 for ACR-TIRADS and 0.077 for K-TIRADS), mainly through reclassification of benign nodules (NRI_nonevent = 0.271 and 0.129), whereas reclassification of malignant nodules worsened (NRI_event = −0.178 and −0.052). Conclusions Focal FDG uptake and SUVmax on PET/CT provided only modest incremental value beyond ultrasonographic risk stratification, largely confined to the reclassification of benign nodules. Nevertheless, the absence of focal FDG uptake did not reliably exclude malignancy in nodules with intermediate- or high-risk sonographic features, given the high malignancy rate observed in these FDG-nonavid nodules (41.4%–77.8%).

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Frontiers in Endocrinology
Published
2026-11-10
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3389/fendo.2026.1978990
Primary Topic
Thyroid Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
NOV
article

Adjunctive role of focal FDG Uptake on PET/CT in assessing thyroid malignancy beyond sonography

Hyun Jin Ryu, Soo Yeon Hahn, Hyunjong Lee, Da Eun Leem et al.
Frontiers in Endocrinology
Thyroid Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment
article

Adjunctive role of focal FDG Uptake on PET/CT in assessing thyroid malignancy beyond sonography

Hyun Jin Ryu, Soo Yeon Hahn, Hyunjong Lee, Da Eun Leem, Joon Young Choi, Sun Wook Kim, Jae Hoon Chung, Tae Hyuk Kim, Bo Ram Kim, Yuwon Kim, Ji Hyun Yoo
article en

Abstract

Introduction Focal fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) uptake on positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) has been associated with thyroid malignancy. However, its incremental value beyond ultrasonographic risk stratification remains unclear. We evaluated whether focal FDG uptake and the maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax) improve the prediction of malignancy when incorporated into ultrasonographic risk stratification systems. Methods This retrospective cohort study included 464 thyroid nodules from 454 individuals who underwent ultrasonography, biopsy, and PET/CT between 2017 and 2022 at our tertiary referral hospital. PET/CT had been performed for cancer work-up in 96.6% of nodules. Nodules were classified according to the American College of Radiology Thyroid Imaging Reporting and Data System (ACR-TIRADS) and the Korean Thyroid Imaging Reporting and Data System (K-TIRADS). Diagnostic performance was assessed using receiver operating characteristic analysis and the area under the curve (AUC). Incremental value was evaluated using the net reclassification improvement (NRI) and decision curve analysis. Results Among 464 nodules, 221 (47.6%) were malignant. The malignancy rate was higher in nodules with focal FDG uptake than in those without (52.3% vs. 24.4%). Adding focal FDG uptake increased the AUC for both ACR-TIRADS and K-TIRADS; however, the overall NRI was not improved. The absence of focal FDG uptake modestly improved the reclassification of benign nodules (NRI_nonevent = 0.070 for ACR-TIRADS and 0.045 for K-TIRADS). SUVmax was positively associated with malignancy risk without a clear diagnostic cutoff. Incorporating SUVmax improved the AUC and the overall NRI (0.093 for ACR-TIRADS and 0.077 for K-TIRADS), mainly through reclassification of benign nodules (NRI_nonevent = 0.271 and 0.129), whereas reclassification of malignant nodules worsened (NRI_event = −0.178 and −0.052). Conclusions Focal FDG uptake and SUVmax on PET/CT provided only modest incremental value beyond ultrasonographic risk stratification, largely confined to the reclassification of benign nodules. Nevertheless, the absence of focal FDG uptake did not reliably exclude malignancy in nodules with intermediate- or high-risk sonographic features, given the high malignancy rate observed in these FDG-nonavid nodules (41.4%–77.8%).

Frontiers in EndocrinologyVol. 17
Ewha Womans University (KR), Gyeongsang National University (KR), Samsung Medical Center (KR), Korea Institute of Radiological and Medical Sciences (KR), Gyeongsang National University Hospital (KR), Kyung Hee University Hospital at Gangdong (KR), Kyung Hee University Medical Hospital at Gangdong (KR), Ewha Womans University Seoul Hospital (KR), Sungkyunkwan University (KR)
Thyroid Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon