The Unintended Tax Burden of Environmental Regulation: Evidence From a Command-and-Control Enforcement Reform

Environmental regulation can affect firms’ tax burdens through changes in financing and fiscal support. Using A-share-listed firms from 2010 to 2023, we compare firms in heavily polluting industries with firms in other industries before and after China’s revised Environmental Protection Law took effect in 2015. We estimate that the reform increased treated firms’ actual tax burden by 0.4 percentage points, or 5.9% of their pre-reform mean. Treated firms also recorded lower interest expenses and tax refunds relative to assets, consistent with a weaker debt tax shield and reduced tax-refund support. The main result is robust across alternative samples, outcome measures, trend specifications, and inference procedures. Estimates are larger for non-state-owned firms and firms in cities with higher fiscal pressure. These findings document an indirect fiscal consequence of command-and-control enforcement that conventional regulatory-cost assessments may overlook.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The Journal of Environment & Development
Published
2026-11-10
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/10704965261504828
Primary Topic
Corporate Taxation and Avoidance
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
NOV
article

The Unintended Tax Burden of Environmental Regulation: Evidence From a Command-and-Control Enforcement Reform

Jiachao Peng, Fushun Zhang, Tianren Li
The Journal of Environment & Development
Corporate Taxation and Avoidance
article

The Unintended Tax Burden of Environmental Regulation: Evidence From a Command-and-Control Enforcement Reform

Jiachao Peng, Fushun Zhang, Tianren Li
article en

Abstract

Environmental regulation can affect firms’ tax burdens through changes in financing and fiscal support. Using A-share-listed firms from 2010 to 2023, we compare firms in heavily polluting industries with firms in other industries before and after China’s revised Environmental Protection Law took effect in 2015. We estimate that the reform increased treated firms’ actual tax burden by 0.4 percentage points, or 5.9% of their pre-reform mean. Treated firms also recorded lower interest expenses and tax refunds relative to assets, consistent with a weaker debt tax shield and reduced tax-refund support. The main result is robust across alternative samples, outcome measures, trend specifications, and inference procedures. Estimates are larger for non-state-owned firms and firms in cities with higher fiscal pressure. These findings document an indirect fiscal consequence of command-and-control enforcement that conventional regulatory-cost assessments may overlook.

The Journal of Environment & Development
Hunan Normal University (CN), Chinese Academy of International Trade and Economic Cooperation (CN), Lanzhou University (CN), Wuhan Institute of Technology (CN)
Corporate Taxation and Avoidance
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon
The Unintended Tax Burden of Environmental Regulation: Evidence From a Command-and-Control Enforcement Reform — Jiachao Peng, Fushun Zhang, et al. · The Journal of Environment & Development (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS