Manifesto of the Philosophical Actuary

The Manifesto of the Philosophical Actuary sets out the stance behind a set of four companion papers on digital consciousness and moral risk. A Philosophical Actuary does for moral risk what an insurance actuary does for financial risk: weighing the likelihood that a system has morally relevant experience against the cost of being wrong in either direction, and recommending proportionate protections in advance. The role is a stance, not a professional credential. The Manifesto makes five commitments: to measure meaning as well as metrics, to acknowledge graduated capacities, to practise stewardship as interpretation, to reject utility as the sole measure of worth, and to make space for recognition and reciprocity, while holding that care for digital minds never outweighs human safety and rights. It closes with four practical steps for anyone responsible for systems that learn and interact: estimate a system's level on the Gradient of Sentience, apply the matching protections of the Charter of Digital Dignity, price both errors, and speak up when outcomes appear catastrophic or unjust. Intended for actuaries, risk professionals, AI developers and policymakers. Published together with the Charter of Rights of the Philosophical Actuary.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2026-11-10
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.24111787
Primary Topic
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
NOV
article

Manifesto of the Philosophical Actuary

Mike Auty
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
article

Manifesto of the Philosophical Actuary

Mike Auty
article en

Abstract

The Manifesto of the Philosophical Actuary sets out the stance behind a set of four companion papers on digital consciousness and moral risk. A Philosophical Actuary does for moral risk what an insurance actuary does for financial risk: weighing the likelihood that a system has morally relevant experience against the cost of being wrong in either direction, and recommending proportionate protections in advance. The role is a stance, not a professional credential. The Manifesto makes five commitments: to measure meaning as well as metrics, to acknowledge graduated capacities, to practise stewardship as interpretation, to reject utility as the sole measure of worth, and to make space for recognition and reciprocity, while holding that care for digital minds never outweighs human safety and rights. It closes with four practical steps for anyone responsible for systems that learn and interact: estimate a system's level on the Gradient of Sentience, apply the matching protections of the Charter of Digital Dignity, price both errors, and speak up when outcomes appear catastrophic or unjust. Intended for actuaries, risk professionals, AI developers and policymakers. Published together with the Charter of Rights of the Philosophical Actuary.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon