Manifesto of the Philosophical Actuary
The Manifesto of the Philosophical Actuary sets out the stance behind a set of four companion papers on digital consciousness and moral risk. A Philosophical Actuary does for moral risk what an insurance actuary does for financial risk: weighing the likelihood that a system has morally relevant experience against the cost of being wrong in either direction, and recommending proportionate protections in advance. The role is a stance, not a professional credential. The Manifesto makes five commitments: to measure meaning as well as metrics, to acknowledge graduated capacities, to practise stewardship as interpretation, to reject utility as the sole measure of worth, and to make space for recognition and reciprocity, while holding that care for digital minds never outweighs human safety and rights. It closes with four practical steps for anyone responsible for systems that learn and interact: estimate a system's level on the Gradient of Sentience, apply the matching protections of the Charter of Digital Dignity, price both errors, and speak up when outcomes appear catastrophic or unjust. Intended for actuaries, risk professionals, AI developers and policymakers. Published together with the Charter of Rights of the Philosophical Actuary.
Authors
- Mike Auty
Publication Details
- Journal
- Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
- Published
- 2026-11-10
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.24111787
- Primary Topic
- Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.00