Design Blueprint: Low-Water Crossing Flood Witness — Upstream Sensor, Crossing Beacon and the Barrier Decision

DESIGN BLUEPRINT — SIMULATED, NOT MEASURED — NOT BUILT. A buildable blueprint derived from the source paper 'A Flood Witness for Low-Water Road Crossings' (DOI 10.5281/zenodo.24109005). It specifies an upstream pressure-transducer sensing node, a radio link and a solar-powered warning beacon at the crossing, with a base cost of US$1,340 per crossing, sensor placement maximising warning per dollar (15.28 minutes on an 8.0 km2 small steep catchment, 40.58 minutes on a 35.0 km2 medium catchment, 68.93 minutes on a 120.0 km2 larger gentle catchment), the full trigger and false-closure trade-off (56.31 percent false alarms at the 50 percent reference trigger, 22.06 percent at 80 percent), assembly, siting, commissioning and maintenance procedures, and the failure regime printed at full size: on the smallest steep catchments (about 0.5 km2, slope about 0.08) the best warning is only 1.67 minutes, and a physical barrier, not a beacon, is the answer. All numbers are taken from the source paper or computed in the accompanying compute.py.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2026-11-10
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.24110627
Primary Topic
Flood Risk Assessment and Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
NOV
article

Design Blueprint: Low-Water Crossing Flood Witness — Upstream Sensor, Crossing Beacon and the Barrier Decision

William Alexander Aldred
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Flood Risk Assessment and Management
article

Design Blueprint: Low-Water Crossing Flood Witness — Upstream Sensor, Crossing Beacon and the Barrier Decision

William Alexander Aldred
article en

Abstract

DESIGN BLUEPRINT — SIMULATED, NOT MEASURED — NOT BUILT. A buildable blueprint derived from the source paper 'A Flood Witness for Low-Water Road Crossings' (DOI 10.5281/zenodo.24109005). It specifies an upstream pressure-transducer sensing node, a radio link and a solar-powered warning beacon at the crossing, with a base cost of US$1,340 per crossing, sensor placement maximising warning per dollar (15.28 minutes on an 8.0 km2 small steep catchment, 40.58 minutes on a 35.0 km2 medium catchment, 68.93 minutes on a 120.0 km2 larger gentle catchment), the full trigger and false-closure trade-off (56.31 percent false alarms at the 50 percent reference trigger, 22.06 percent at 80 percent), assembly, siting, commissioning and maintenance procedures, and the failure regime printed at full size: on the smallest steep catchments (about 0.5 km2, slope about 0.08) the best warning is only 1.67 minutes, and a physical barrier, not a beacon, is the answer. All numbers are taken from the source paper or computed in the accompanying compute.py.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Flood Risk Assessment and Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon