Association between lipid profile alterations and azotemia severity in dogs: a cross-sectional study

Background Renal dysfunction in dogs is accompanied by metabolic and biochemical disturbances, including dyslipidemia. However, information on the relationship between lipid abnormalities and azotemia severity remains limited. This study evaluated lipid profile alterations and their association with biochemical and hematological parameters in azotemic dogs. Methods Clinical and laboratory records of 100 dogs presented to the Teaching Veterinary Clinical Complex, Bihar Veterinary College, Patna, India, between April 2024 and March 2025 were retrospectively evaluated. The study included 50 healthy and 50 azotemic dogs with serum creatinine >1.7 mg/dl. Azotemic dogs were categorized as Group 1 (1.7- <5.0 mg/dl; n = 17), Group 2 (5.0–15.0 mg/dl; n = 23), and Group 3 (>15.0 mg/dl; n = 10). Hematological, renal, electrolyte, hepatic-associated biochemical, and lipid parameters were evaluated. Data were expressed as median (interquartile range). Group differences were assessed using the Kruskal–Wallis H test followed by Dunn's post-hoc test with Bonferroni correction. Associations were evaluated using Spearman's rank correlation coefficient (ρ), with p < 0.05 considered significant. Results Compared with healthy dogs, azotemic dogs had lower hemoglobin and hematocrit and higher blood urea nitrogen, potassium, phosphorus, alkaline phosphatase, and total bilirubin concentrations. Albumin was significantly lower in Groups 2 and 3. Cholesterol, triglycerides, and low-density lipoprotein (LDL) were significantly higher in all azotemia groups than in healthy controls, whereas high-density lipoprotein did not differ significantly. However, cholesterol, triglycerides, and LDL did not differ significantly among azotemia groups, indicating no stepwise increase with creatinine-defined severity. In the overall azotemic population, creatinine correlated positively with cholesterol (ρ = 0.393, p < 0.001), triglycerides (ρ = 0.265, p = 0.008), and LDL (ρ = 0.457, p < 0.001). Blood urea nitrogen correlated positively with cholesterol (ρ = 0.455, p < 0.001) and LDL (ρ = 0.571, p < 0.001). Conclusion Azotemia in dogs is associated with dyslipidemia and broader systemic biochemical alterations. Although cholesterol, triglycerides, and LDL were increased in azotemic dogs, they did not progressively increase across creatinine-defined categories. Lipid profiling may therefore serve as an adjunct to metabolic evaluation, while longitudinal studies incorporating additional renal biomarkers are warranted.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Frontiers in Veterinary Science
Published
2026-11-10
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3389/fvets.2026.1918512
Primary Topic
Veterinary Medicine and Surgery
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
NOV
article

Association between lipid profile alterations and azotemia severity in dogs: a cross-sectional study

Pallav Shekhar, R. A. Siddique, Gyan Dev Singh, Sonam Bhatt et al.
Frontiers in Veterinary Science
Veterinary Medicine and Surgery
article

Association between lipid profile alterations and azotemia severity in dogs: a cross-sectional study

Pallav Shekhar, R. A. Siddique, Gyan Dev Singh, Sonam Bhatt, Himalaya Bhardwaj, Ravi Shankar Kumar Mandal, Amrita Behera, Ramesh Tiwary, Purushottam Kaushik, Kaushlendra Kumar, Rajesh Kumar, Vivek Kumar Singh, Pankaj Kumar, Deepak Kumar, Ajeet Kumar
article en

Abstract

Background Renal dysfunction in dogs is accompanied by metabolic and biochemical disturbances, including dyslipidemia. However, information on the relationship between lipid abnormalities and azotemia severity remains limited. This study evaluated lipid profile alterations and their association with biochemical and hematological parameters in azotemic dogs. Methods Clinical and laboratory records of 100 dogs presented to the Teaching Veterinary Clinical Complex, Bihar Veterinary College, Patna, India, between April 2024 and March 2025 were retrospectively evaluated. The study included 50 healthy and 50 azotemic dogs with serum creatinine >1.7 mg/dl. Azotemic dogs were categorized as Group 1 (1.7- <5.0 mg/dl; n = 17), Group 2 (5.0–15.0 mg/dl; n = 23), and Group 3 (>15.0 mg/dl; n = 10). Hematological, renal, electrolyte, hepatic-associated biochemical, and lipid parameters were evaluated. Data were expressed as median (interquartile range). Group differences were assessed using the Kruskal–Wallis H test followed by Dunn's post-hoc test with Bonferroni correction. Associations were evaluated using Spearman's rank correlation coefficient (ρ), with p < 0.05 considered significant. Results Compared with healthy dogs, azotemic dogs had lower hemoglobin and hematocrit and higher blood urea nitrogen, potassium, phosphorus, alkaline phosphatase, and total bilirubin concentrations. Albumin was significantly lower in Groups 2 and 3. Cholesterol, triglycerides, and low-density lipoprotein (LDL) were significantly higher in all azotemia groups than in healthy controls, whereas high-density lipoprotein did not differ significantly. However, cholesterol, triglycerides, and LDL did not differ significantly among azotemia groups, indicating no stepwise increase with creatinine-defined severity. In the overall azotemic population, creatinine correlated positively with cholesterol (ρ = 0.393, p < 0.001), triglycerides (ρ = 0.265, p = 0.008), and LDL (ρ = 0.457, p < 0.001). Blood urea nitrogen correlated positively with cholesterol (ρ = 0.455, p < 0.001) and LDL (ρ = 0.571, p < 0.001). Conclusion Azotemia in dogs is associated with dyslipidemia and broader systemic biochemical alterations. Although cholesterol, triglycerides, and LDL were increased in azotemic dogs, they did not progressively increase across creatinine-defined categories. Lipid profiling may therefore serve as an adjunct to metabolic evaluation, while longitudinal studies incorporating additional renal biomarkers are warranted.

Frontiers in Veterinary ScienceVol. 13
Veterinary Medicine and Surgery
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon