THE IMPACT OF STICKY BONE GAP AUGMENTATION ON BUCCAL BONE PRESERVATION AFTER IMMEDIATE IMPLANTS IN MAXILLARY SINGLE ROOTED TEETH: A RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL

Abstract Introduction: Immediate implant placement reduces treatment time and preserves prosthetic outcomes but often leaves a peri‑implant "jumping gap" between implant and buccal socket wall. The need to graft this gap remains controversial. This randomized study assessed whether filling the peri‑implant gap with sticky bone improves hard‑tissue preservation and implant stability for single‑rooted maxillary teeth. Materials and methods: Thirteen patients (16 implants; age 20-43 years) requiring extraction of single‑rooted maxillary anterior or premolar teeth were randomized into two equal groups. Group 1 (control) received immediate implants without grafting (n = 8); Group 2 (study) received immediate implants with sticky bone grafting of jumping gaps ≥2 mm (n = 8). ROOTT implants (10-12 mm length; 3.5-4.2 mm diameter) were placed following a standardized surgical protocol. Clinical assessment and CBCT were performed immediately and at 6 months. Outcomes included buccal bone width (at 2, 4, 6 mm levels), crestal bone loss, CBCT‑derived bone density (NewTom Giano HR), and implant stability (Osstell ISQ). Statistical analysis used Shapiro–Wilk, independent‑samples t tests, and paired‑samples t tests (α = 0.05). Results: All implants survived at 6 months (100% survival). Grafted sites showed a significant increase in buccal bone width (mean change +33.7%) versus significant reduction in controls (-25.9%; P < 0.001). Crestal bone loss was greater in control than grafted sites (P = 0.007). Bone density and ISQ increased significantly over time in both groups but did not differ between groups in 6 months. Conclusion: Within 6 months, sticky bone grafting of peri‑implant gaps during immediate implant placement preserved buccal contours and reduced marginal bone loss. Larger, longer‑term studies with histologic evaluation are recommended.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Tianjin University Science and Technology
Published
2026-11-10
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.24104258
Primary Topic
Dental Implant Techniques and Outcomes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
NOV
article

THE IMPACT OF STICKY BONE GAP AUGMENTATION ON BUCCAL BONE PRESERVATION AFTER IMMEDIATE IMPLANTS IN MAXILLARY SINGLE ROOTED TEETH: A RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL

Mohamed Ahmed ElSholkamy, SW ARAFAT, AHMED HOSSAM ELDIN, ALSHAIMA ADEL AHMED TANTAWY
Journal of Tianjin University Science and Technology
Dental Implant Techniques and Outcomes
article

THE IMPACT OF STICKY BONE GAP AUGMENTATION ON BUCCAL BONE PRESERVATION AFTER IMMEDIATE IMPLANTS IN MAXILLARY SINGLE ROOTED TEETH: A RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL

Mohamed Ahmed ElSholkamy, SW ARAFAT, AHMED HOSSAM ELDIN, ALSHAIMA ADEL AHMED TANTAWY
article en

Abstract

Abstract Introduction: Immediate implant placement reduces treatment time and preserves prosthetic outcomes but often leaves a peri‑implant "jumping gap" between implant and buccal socket wall. The need to graft this gap remains controversial. This randomized study assessed whether filling the peri‑implant gap with sticky bone improves hard‑tissue preservation and implant stability for single‑rooted maxillary teeth. Materials and methods: Thirteen patients (16 implants; age 20-43 years) requiring extraction of single‑rooted maxillary anterior or premolar teeth were randomized into two equal groups. Group 1 (control) received immediate implants without grafting (n = 8); Group 2 (study) received immediate implants with sticky bone grafting of jumping gaps ≥2 mm (n = 8). ROOTT implants (10-12 mm length; 3.5-4.2 mm diameter) were placed following a standardized surgical protocol. Clinical assessment and CBCT were performed immediately and at 6 months. Outcomes included buccal bone width (at 2, 4, 6 mm levels), crestal bone loss, CBCT‑derived bone density (NewTom Giano HR), and implant stability (Osstell ISQ). Statistical analysis used Shapiro–Wilk, independent‑samples t tests, and paired‑samples t tests (α = 0.05). Results: All implants survived at 6 months (100% survival). Grafted sites showed a significant increase in buccal bone width (mean change +33.7%) versus significant reduction in controls (-25.9%; P < 0.001). Crestal bone loss was greater in control than grafted sites (P = 0.007). Bone density and ISQ increased significantly over time in both groups but did not differ between groups in 6 months. Conclusion: Within 6 months, sticky bone grafting of peri‑implant gaps during immediate implant placement preserved buccal contours and reduced marginal bone loss. Larger, longer‑term studies with histologic evaluation are recommended.

Journal of Tianjin University Science and Technology
Suez Canal University (EG), October University of Modern Sciences and Arts (EG)
Dental Implant Techniques and Outcomes
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon