What do you think about learning in physical education? Unveiling Taiwanese high school students’ conceptions of learning physical education

Background: While the ‘conceptions of learning’ framework extensively maps epistemological beliefs in cognitive disciplines, its application to the somatic domain of physical education (PE) remains critically underexplored. In Taiwan's credentialist educational culture, PE is frequently marginalized into assessment-driven compliance. Investigating how adolescents construct meaning from bodily movement in such restrictive environments is essential for dismantling performance-centric paradigms and advancing physical literacy.Purpose: This phenomenographic study aimed to uncover how Taiwanese high school students conceptualize learning in physical education (CoLPE). Mapping the structural and referential variations of these embodied conceptions explores the intersection between students’ intrinsic psychological needs and the systemic constraints of an examination-driven culture.Methods: Employing a qualitative phenomenographic methodology, researchers purposively sampled 45 high school students (23 males, 22 females) across Taiwan. Data was collected through 45- to 60-minute semi-structured interviews contrasting general learning beliefs with PE-specific experiences. Following rigorous phenomenographic procedures, verbatim transcripts underwent continuous, iterative analysis. Researchers pooled core summaries to generate distinct meanings, establishing hierarchically related categories of description.Results: The analysis constructed seven hierarchically ordered categories of CoLPE: (1) Skill Testing, (2) Motor Skills Acquisition, (3) Engaging Physical Activity, (4) Increasing Knowledge of Sports, (5) Sports Knowledge Integration, (6) Embodiment Practice, and (7) Seeing the Physical in a New Way. These reveal a continuum ranging from surface-level, quantitative orientations driven by examination cultures (Categories 1–4) to deep, constructivist perspectives propelled by robust intrinsic motivation (Categories 5–7).Conclusion: Taiwanese high school students possess a profound capacity for deep, embodied learning, though this potential is frequently suppressed by rigid, assessment-driven cultures. Because individuals often hold multiple, overlapping conceptions simultaneously depending on the pedagogical context, cultivating higher-order physical literacy requires educators to shift from rote skill reproduction toward meaning-making.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Physical Education and Sport Pedagogy
Published
2026-11-10
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/17408989.2026.2754493
Primary Topic
Physical Education and Pedagogy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
NOV
article

What do you think about learning in physical education? Unveiling Taiwanese high school students’ conceptions of learning physical education

Risto Harri Juhani Marttinen, Hung-Ying Lee, Ching-Wei Chang
Physical Education and Sport Pedagogy
Physical Education and Pedagogy
article

What do you think about learning in physical education? Unveiling Taiwanese high school students’ conceptions of learning physical education

Risto Harri Juhani Marttinen, Hung-Ying Lee, Ching-Wei Chang
article en

Abstract

Background: While the ‘conceptions of learning’ framework extensively maps epistemological beliefs in cognitive disciplines, its application to the somatic domain of physical education (PE) remains critically underexplored. In Taiwan's credentialist educational culture, PE is frequently marginalized into assessment-driven compliance. Investigating how adolescents construct meaning from bodily movement in such restrictive environments is essential for dismantling performance-centric paradigms and advancing physical literacy.Purpose: This phenomenographic study aimed to uncover how Taiwanese high school students conceptualize learning in physical education (CoLPE). Mapping the structural and referential variations of these embodied conceptions explores the intersection between students’ intrinsic psychological needs and the systemic constraints of an examination-driven culture.Methods: Employing a qualitative phenomenographic methodology, researchers purposively sampled 45 high school students (23 males, 22 females) across Taiwan. Data was collected through 45- to 60-minute semi-structured interviews contrasting general learning beliefs with PE-specific experiences. Following rigorous phenomenographic procedures, verbatim transcripts underwent continuous, iterative analysis. Researchers pooled core summaries to generate distinct meanings, establishing hierarchically related categories of description.Results: The analysis constructed seven hierarchically ordered categories of CoLPE: (1) Skill Testing, (2) Motor Skills Acquisition, (3) Engaging Physical Activity, (4) Increasing Knowledge of Sports, (5) Sports Knowledge Integration, (6) Embodiment Practice, and (7) Seeing the Physical in a New Way. These reveal a continuum ranging from surface-level, quantitative orientations driven by examination cultures (Categories 1–4) to deep, constructivist perspectives propelled by robust intrinsic motivation (Categories 5–7).Conclusion: Taiwanese high school students possess a profound capacity for deep, embodied learning, though this potential is frequently suppressed by rigid, assessment-driven cultures. Because individuals often hold multiple, overlapping conceptions simultaneously depending on the pedagogical context, cultivating higher-order physical literacy requires educators to shift from rote skill reproduction toward meaning-making.

Physical Education and Sport Pedagogy
National Taiwan Normal University (TW), George Mason University (US), National Dong Hwa University (TW)
Physical Education and Pedagogy
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon