High elevation does not predispose alpine plants to be more productive under elevated CO 2

In a recent publication by Chen et al. (Ecology Letters), it has been suggested that photosynthetic responses to elevated CO2 (termed CO2 fertilisation effect, CFE) resulted in increased gross primary productivity (GPP) and have boosted above-ground biomass in an alpine sedge-dominated grassland at 4585 m elevation in Tibet. Here, we offer a critical assessment of the experiment’s outcome reported by these authors. We note that photosynthesis was not measured in the study. Calculated as GPP, the increased flux was entirely due to increased ecosystem respiration, inappropriately assessed by short-term darkening of vegetation during bright daylight hours. We conclude that the data presented do not permit making a case for CFE on biomass production in such alpine grasslands. By what is known, these natural ecosystems are not carbon limited.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Plant Ecology & Diversity
Published
2026-11-10
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/17550874.2026.2759184
Primary Topic
Plant responses to elevated CO2
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
NOV
article

High elevation does not predispose alpine plants to be more productive under elevated CO 2

Patrick Möhl, Christian Körner, Erika Hiltbrunner
Plant Ecology & Diversity
Plant responses to elevated CO2
article

High elevation does not predispose alpine plants to be more productive under elevated CO 2

Patrick Möhl, Christian Körner, Erika Hiltbrunner
article en

Abstract

In a recent publication by Chen et al. (Ecology Letters), it has been suggested that photosynthetic responses to elevated CO2 (termed CO2 fertilisation effect, CFE) resulted in increased gross primary productivity (GPP) and have boosted above-ground biomass in an alpine sedge-dominated grassland at 4585 m elevation in Tibet. Here, we offer a critical assessment of the experiment’s outcome reported by these authors. We note that photosynthesis was not measured in the study. Calculated as GPP, the increased flux was entirely due to increased ecosystem respiration, inappropriately assessed by short-term darkening of vegetation during bright daylight hours. We conclude that the data presented do not permit making a case for CFE on biomass production in such alpine grasslands. By what is known, these natural ecosystems are not carbon limited.

Plant Ecology & Diversity
University of Basel (CH), Lancaster University (GB)
Plant responses to elevated CO2
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon