Sensitivity review of public records: A thematic qualitative inquiry

Sensitive information in public records is critically important for public security and individual privacy. For this reason, it is essential to examine in a comprehensive manner how records containing sensitive information are managed and appraised during their transfer to national archival institutions in accordance with records management and archival science principles. Research that approaches the sensitivity review process from a holistic perspective remains limited. This study aims to address this gap by examining the management and appraisal practices applied during the transfer of public records containing sensitive information to national archives. Within a qualitative research design, the views of archival specialists were collected through semi-structured interviews. Data were obtained from eight archival specialists, six from Türkiye and two from the United Kingdom, a leading country in the field of archives and records management. The findings reveal a comprehensive thematic structure consisting of five themes, eighteen categories and 101 codes. This structure demonstrates the challenges encountered in the sensitivity review process, the professional and technological approaches developed to address these challenges and the influence of institutional mechanisms on the process. Archival specialists insights provide new perspectives on the issues inherent in sensitivity review. The study concludes that sensitivity review is a context-dependent, multidimensional and ethically grounded area of professional practice that requires a systematic approach within archival agencies. It also offers original methodological and technological contributions to the literature by presenting Archival specialists evaluations on how AI-assisted review tools may transform sensitivity review processes.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Bilgi Dünyası
Published
2026-11-10
DOI
https://doi.org/10.15612/bd.2026.899
Primary Topic
Digital and Traditional Archives Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
NOV
article

Sensitivity review of public records: A thematic qualitative inquiry

Fatih Rukancı, Hasan Öztürk
Bilgi Dünyası
Digital and Traditional Archives Management
article

Sensitivity review of public records: A thematic qualitative inquiry

Fatih Rukancı, Hasan Öztürk
article en

Abstract

Sensitive information in public records is critically important for public security and individual privacy. For this reason, it is essential to examine in a comprehensive manner how records containing sensitive information are managed and appraised during their transfer to national archival institutions in accordance with records management and archival science principles. Research that approaches the sensitivity review process from a holistic perspective remains limited. This study aims to address this gap by examining the management and appraisal practices applied during the transfer of public records containing sensitive information to national archives. Within a qualitative research design, the views of archival specialists were collected through semi-structured interviews. Data were obtained from eight archival specialists, six from Türkiye and two from the United Kingdom, a leading country in the field of archives and records management. The findings reveal a comprehensive thematic structure consisting of five themes, eighteen categories and 101 codes. This structure demonstrates the challenges encountered in the sensitivity review process, the professional and technological approaches developed to address these challenges and the influence of institutional mechanisms on the process. Archival specialists insights provide new perspectives on the issues inherent in sensitivity review. The study concludes that sensitivity review is a context-dependent, multidimensional and ethically grounded area of professional practice that requires a systematic approach within archival agencies. It also offers original methodological and technological contributions to the literature by presenting Archival specialists evaluations on how AI-assisted review tools may transform sensitivity review processes.

Bilgi DünyasıVol. 27
Ankara University (TR), Bartin University (TR)
Digital and Traditional Archives Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon