Can Dynamics Close the Laboratory Gap? Rotating and Oscillating Spin-Polarised Sources in the Aldred Frame

A companion evaluation of the Aldred Limit (Einstein-Cartan spin-torsion balance density rho_A = 9.72e54 g/cm3; fractional correction drho/rho = rho/rho_A) found every static laboratory channel short by 35.5-49 orders of magnitude, and the spin contact channel short by 25 orders. This paper prices the dynamical escapes. Rotation changes the algebraic torsion coupling by a factor of exactly one (0 orders). Resonance would need Q = 8.6e24 (spin channel) against 1e10 achieved (at most 10 orders). Coherent integration gains as sqrt(T): one year buys 3.75 orders; closing the spin gap by integration alone takes 7.5e49 s. The largest laboratory spin density (ferromagnetic iron, 1.87e23 cm^-3) is 3.0e-25 of the 6.2e47 cm^-3 required; superconductors contribute zero (singlet pairs). Stacking all mechanisms generously buys 16.4 orders against a smallest gap of 24.9, leaving 8.5-11.2 orders unclosed: dynamics does not close the laboratory gap. AI-use disclosure: this paper was prepared with the assistance of Dave, an AI system of Aldred Industries, under the direction of the author; all results were verified by direct computation in the deposited script.