Where Retention Stops Being Free: Decay and Refresh in DNA Archival Storage

A companion result for classical archives found retention nearly free. This paper finds the boundary of that law for DNA, which decays chemically even in the dark. Using published depurination kinetics (Lindahl and Nyberg 1972; Lindahl 1993), silica encapsulation protection (Grass et al. 2015), and the Allentoft et al. 2012 bone DNA half-life as a cross-check, we compute for 200-nt strands over 1000 years: strand survival, write-time redundancy for a stated recovery probability, and refresh interval and cost. Dry silica-encapsulated DNA at 25 C keeps 0.9575 of strands intact at 1000 years, needs one copy per strand behind a 30 percent outer code, and zero refreshes. Frozen encapsulated DNA keeps 0.999995. Aqueous unencapsulated DNA at 25 C crosses the code repair limit (S=0.70) at 27.35 years, would need 12,759,794 copies per strand at 1000 years without refresh, and needs 36 refreshes per 1000 years at a cumulative model cost of 2.25e5 J per GB, comparable to tape migration practice (50 per 1000 years). Sensitivity over temperature and encapsulation quality places the practical protection threshold near a factor of 100. Model calculations are labelled SIMULATED, NOT MEASURED. The deposit includes the paper PDF, the computation script (compute.py) producing every number in the paper, and its outputs (results.json, results.txt).

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2026-11-10
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.24111154
Primary Topic
DNA and Biological Computing
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
NOV
article

Where Retention Stops Being Free: Decay and Refresh in DNA Archival Storage

William Alexander Aldred
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
DNA and Biological Computing
article

Where Retention Stops Being Free: Decay and Refresh in DNA Archival Storage

William Alexander Aldred
article en

Abstract

A companion result for classical archives found retention nearly free. This paper finds the boundary of that law for DNA, which decays chemically even in the dark. Using published depurination kinetics (Lindahl and Nyberg 1972; Lindahl 1993), silica encapsulation protection (Grass et al. 2015), and the Allentoft et al. 2012 bone DNA half-life as a cross-check, we compute for 200-nt strands over 1000 years: strand survival, write-time redundancy for a stated recovery probability, and refresh interval and cost. Dry silica-encapsulated DNA at 25 C keeps 0.9575 of strands intact at 1000 years, needs one copy per strand behind a 30 percent outer code, and zero refreshes. Frozen encapsulated DNA keeps 0.999995. Aqueous unencapsulated DNA at 25 C crosses the code repair limit (S=0.70) at 27.35 years, would need 12,759,794 copies per strand at 1000 years without refresh, and needs 36 refreshes per 1000 years at a cumulative model cost of 2.25e5 J per GB, comparable to tape migration practice (50 per 1000 years). Sensitivity over temperature and encapsulation quality places the practical protection threshold near a factor of 100. Model calculations are labelled SIMULATED, NOT MEASURED. The deposit includes the paper PDF, the computation script (compute.py) producing every number in the paper, and its outputs (results.json, results.txt).

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
DNA and Biological Computing
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon
Where Retention Stops Being Free: Decay and Refresh in DNA Archival Storage — William Alexander Aldred · Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS