Adaptive Weighted Democracy

The DPA treats democratic decision-making as a collective neural network: people are the units, certified competences by issue are the weights, technical constraints produce an error signal that returns to the proposals, and the re-vote is the correction step. Public decisions are broken down into issues: objectives, technical constraints, strategies, universal rights. Every person has recognised competences, derived from education and work experience and certified by several independent AI systems, without human intervention. On each issue, those who exceed the competence threshold relevant to that issue vote, with a weight that grows with competence up to a cap; universal rights are voted by equal vote. The rules of admission, weight and minimum base are those of TEPS 1.5 [12]. Public registers record who is summoned and who votes, never the content of the vote.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2026-11-10
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.24100874
Primary Topic
Political Theory and Democracy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
NOV
article

Adaptive Weighted Democracy

Cristian Lorenzetto
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Political Theory and Democracy
article

Adaptive Weighted Democracy

Cristian Lorenzetto
article en

Abstract

The DPA treats democratic decision-making as a collective neural network: people are the units, certified competences by issue are the weights, technical constraints produce an error signal that returns to the proposals, and the re-vote is the correction step. Public decisions are broken down into issues: objectives, technical constraints, strategies, universal rights. Every person has recognised competences, derived from education and work experience and certified by several independent AI systems, without human intervention. On each issue, those who exceed the competence threshold relevant to that issue vote, with a weight that grows with competence up to a cap; universal rights are voted by equal vote. The rules of admission, weight and minimum base are those of TEPS 1.5 [12]. Public registers record who is summoned and who votes, never the content of the vote.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Political Theory and Democracy
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon