The Role-Bundling Problem: Designing Policy Intermediaries for Complex Governance

Public authorities rely on intermediaries to translate policy, coordinate implementation, represent stakeholders, and assess compliance. Existing research recognizes multiple intermediary roles but provides less guidance on which should reside in the same actor. We identify this as the role-bundling problem and propose a relational compatibility test rather than a new role taxonomy. The test examines the proximity or independence, accountability, and legitimacy that each function requires for a specific target and decision. Compatible roles can be bundled, with routine safeguards for transparency and fair access. When a combination threatens an essential relational requirement, designers must ask whether a credible functional firewall can protect it; if not, institutional separation is warranted. An environmental impact assessment illustration shows how the test connects relational diagnosis to design choice. Policy designers should configure role portfolios rather than select intermediary organizations one at a time.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Public Policy Journal
Published
2026-11-10
DOI
https://doi.org/10.55845/stpq9549
Primary Topic
Public Policy and Administration Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
NOV
article

The Role-Bundling Problem: Designing Policy Intermediaries for Complex Governance

Shira Bukchin‐Peles, Avri Eitan
Public Policy Journal
Public Policy and Administration Research
article

The Role-Bundling Problem: Designing Policy Intermediaries for Complex Governance

Shira Bukchin‐Peles, Avri Eitan
article en

Abstract

Public authorities rely on intermediaries to translate policy, coordinate implementation, represent stakeholders, and assess compliance. Existing research recognizes multiple intermediary roles but provides less guidance on which should reside in the same actor. We identify this as the role-bundling problem and propose a relational compatibility test rather than a new role taxonomy. The test examines the proximity or independence, accountability, and legitimacy that each function requires for a specific target and decision. Compatible roles can be bundled, with routine safeguards for transparency and fair access. When a combination threatens an essential relational requirement, designers must ask whether a credible functional firewall can protect it; if not, institutional separation is warranted. An environmental impact assessment illustration shows how the test connects relational diagnosis to design choice. Policy designers should configure role portfolios rather than select intermediary organizations one at a time.

Public Policy JournalVol. 1(1)
Public Policy and Administration Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon