What Gets Adolescents to Click? Dissemination Message Features for Digital Single-Session Mental Health Interventions

Abstract Background Digital, self-guided single-session interventions (SSIs) are scalable, but little is known about how adolescents interpret dissemination messaging intended to promote their use. Methods Using a mixed methods design, we conducted two studies. First, we interviewed 19 adolescents with perceived mental health needs about their reactions to SSIs and promotional messaging. Findings from these interviews informed the development of three ad sets, each varying one COM-B aligned feature: (a) source of recommendation (peer vs. provider endorsement), (b) benefit framing (immediate vs. longer-term benefits), or (c) choice structure (single recommended SSI vs. multiple options). Second, 300 adolescents were recruited for a randomized experiment and assigned to view one prototype. Participants completed measures of hopefulness, readiness to initiate an SSI, prototype perceptions, and open-ended feedback. Data were summarized using descriptive statistics overall and by experimental condition. Qualitative and quantitative findings were integrated during interpretation. Results Most participants were unaware of SSIs (154/300, 51%), yet over half (53.0%) perceived them as helpful, compared with 19.7% who did not and 27.3% who were unsure. Across conditions, mean hopefulness ranged from 2.24 to 2.64 and readiness to initiate an SSI from 4.78 to 5.54, with overlapping 95% CIs. Mean perceived appropriateness was 2.78 (SD = 1.04, 95% CI [2.49, 3.07]) in the provider-endorsement condition. Condition-level differences were small, with overlapping confidence intervals. Conclusions Low awareness of SSIs and limited recall of promotional messaging suggest that dissemination should prioritize clear, concise explanations of SSIs and their immediate benefits. Trusted endorsements from peers and providers may enhance credibility and initial engagement, but additional research is needed to identify strategies that translate interest into SSI uptake. In a crowded digital landscape, where dissemination efforts have lagged behind intervention development, our study is among the first to examine how adolescents interpret and respond to promotional messaging for digital mental health interventions.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Technology in Behavioral Science
Published
2026-11-10
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s41347-026-00759-4
Primary Topic
Digital Mental Health Interventions
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
NOV
article

What Gets Adolescents to Click? Dissemination Message Features for Digital Single-Session Mental Health Interventions

Juan Pablo Zapata, Aileen Kangavary, Jessica Lee Schleider, Mallory Dobias et al.
Journal of Technology in Behavioral Science
Digital Mental Health Interventions
article

What Gets Adolescents to Click? Dissemination Message Features for Digital Single-Session Mental Health Interventions

Juan Pablo Zapata, Aileen Kangavary, Jessica Lee Schleider, Mallory Dobias, Ian Sotomayor, Tyra Bergstrom
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background Digital, self-guided single-session interventions (SSIs) are scalable, but little is known about how adolescents interpret dissemination messaging intended to promote their use. Methods Using a mixed methods design, we conducted two studies. First, we interviewed 19 adolescents with perceived mental health needs about their reactions to SSIs and promotional messaging. Findings from these interviews informed the development of three ad sets, each varying one COM-B aligned feature: (a) source of recommendation (peer vs. provider endorsement), (b) benefit framing (immediate vs. longer-term benefits), or (c) choice structure (single recommended SSI vs. multiple options). Second, 300 adolescents were recruited for a randomized experiment and assigned to view one prototype. Participants completed measures of hopefulness, readiness to initiate an SSI, prototype perceptions, and open-ended feedback. Data were summarized using descriptive statistics overall and by experimental condition. Qualitative and quantitative findings were integrated during interpretation. Results Most participants were unaware of SSIs (154/300, 51%), yet over half (53.0%) perceived them as helpful, compared with 19.7% who did not and 27.3% who were unsure. Across conditions, mean hopefulness ranged from 2.24 to 2.64 and readiness to initiate an SSI from 4.78 to 5.54, with overlapping 95% CIs. Mean perceived appropriateness was 2.78 (SD = 1.04, 95% CI [2.49, 3.07]) in the provider-endorsement condition. Condition-level differences were small, with overlapping confidence intervals. Conclusions Low awareness of SSIs and limited recall of promotional messaging suggest that dissemination should prioritize clear, concise explanations of SSIs and their immediate benefits. Trusted endorsements from peers and providers may enhance credibility and initial engagement, but additional research is needed to identify strategies that translate interest into SSI uptake. In a crowded digital landscape, where dissemination efforts have lagged behind intervention development, our study is among the first to examine how adolescents interpret and respond to promotional messaging for digital mental health interventions.

Journal of Technology in Behavioral Science
Northwestern University (US), University of South Florida (US)
Digital Mental Health Interventions
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon