Social Sustainability in Ecovillages: A Systematic Scoping Review of Collective Processes and Contextual Conditions

ABSTRACT Ecovillages merge ecological practices with alternative modes of collective living, but their sustainability cannot be solely attributed to environmental commitments. This systematic scoping review synthesizes findings from 96 publications identified through Scopus and Web of Science. It examines five social process domains—governance and power, conflict and relational dynamics, collective identity, membership and justice, and everyday practices—alongside economic, institutional, and spatial conditions, as well as various formation pathways. The synthesis reveals context‐dependent configurations: collective arrangements can promote cooperation while also leading to unequal workloads, exclusion, or organizational strain. Conflict does not necessarily result in dissolution, and institutional adaptation does not equate to settlement disappearance. I conceptualize social sustainability as the ongoing organization and renegotiation of collective life, without attributing it primary causative importance over material or ecological factors. The findings advocate for process‐sensitive assessment and planning that distinguish between community continuity, transformation, and disruption.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Sustainable Development
Published
2026-11-10
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.71889
Primary Topic
Collaborative and Sustainable Housing Initiatives
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
NOV
article

Social Sustainability in Ecovillages: A Systematic Scoping Review of Collective Processes and Contextual Conditions

Osman Zeybek
Sustainable Development
Collaborative and Sustainable Housing Initiatives
article

Social Sustainability in Ecovillages: A Systematic Scoping Review of Collective Processes and Contextual Conditions

Osman Zeybek
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT Ecovillages merge ecological practices with alternative modes of collective living, but their sustainability cannot be solely attributed to environmental commitments. This systematic scoping review synthesizes findings from 96 publications identified through Scopus and Web of Science. It examines five social process domains—governance and power, conflict and relational dynamics, collective identity, membership and justice, and everyday practices—alongside economic, institutional, and spatial conditions, as well as various formation pathways. The synthesis reveals context‐dependent configurations: collective arrangements can promote cooperation while also leading to unequal workloads, exclusion, or organizational strain. Conflict does not necessarily result in dissolution, and institutional adaptation does not equate to settlement disappearance. I conceptualize social sustainability as the ongoing organization and renegotiation of collective life, without attributing it primary causative importance over material or ecological factors. The findings advocate for process‐sensitive assessment and planning that distinguish between community continuity, transformation, and disruption.

Sustainable Development
Bursa Uludağ Üni̇versi̇tesi̇ (TR)
Collaborative and Sustainable Housing Initiatives
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon