The Mosquito Net Trade-Off: Mesh Aperture Against Air Movement, and the Hole Size at Which a Net Stops Cooling the Sleeper It Protects

A mosquito net protects by exclusion and penalises by stillness: the finer the mesh, the less air moves under it, and in a hot room the loss of cooling is the price of the bite protection. This paper models air movement through netting as a stated function of its open-area fraction, for apertures from 0.4 to 2.0 mm against a stated thread diameter of 0.25 mm. At the 1.2 mm aperture that excludes the malaria mosquito, the open fraction is 0.685 and the air speed under the net falls to 0.567 of the unnetted value, with relative cooling at 0.711. The 0.6 mm mesh needed against sandflies cuts air speed to 0.352 and cooling to 0.534. The trade-off is quantified as a design table, and the implication — that in sandfly country a fan under the net is not a luxury but the compensating component — follows directly. This study is simulated, not measured.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2026-11-10
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.24119587
Primary Topic
Malaria Research and Control
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
NOV
article

The Mosquito Net Trade-Off: Mesh Aperture Against Air Movement, and the Hole Size at Which a Net Stops Cooling the Sleeper It Protects

William Alexander Aldred
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Malaria Research and Control
article

The Mosquito Net Trade-Off: Mesh Aperture Against Air Movement, and the Hole Size at Which a Net Stops Cooling the Sleeper It Protects

William Alexander Aldred
article en

Abstract

A mosquito net protects by exclusion and penalises by stillness: the finer the mesh, the less air moves under it, and in a hot room the loss of cooling is the price of the bite protection. This paper models air movement through netting as a stated function of its open-area fraction, for apertures from 0.4 to 2.0 mm against a stated thread diameter of 0.25 mm. At the 1.2 mm aperture that excludes the malaria mosquito, the open fraction is 0.685 and the air speed under the net falls to 0.567 of the unnetted value, with relative cooling at 0.711. The 0.6 mm mesh needed against sandflies cuts air speed to 0.352 and cooling to 0.534. The trade-off is quantified as a design table, and the implication — that in sandfly country a fan under the net is not a luxury but the compensating component — follows directly. This study is simulated, not measured.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Malaria Research and Control
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon