Defect Formation, Detection, and Quality Assurance in Additive Manufacturing: A Systematic Review

Additive manufacturing (AM) enables the production of geometrically complex components but introduces process-dependent defects that may compromise dimensional accuracy, surface integrity and mechanical reliability. This systematic review examines defect formation, defect-sensitive quality phenomena, detection and quality assurance across the principal AM process categories, distinguishing discrete manufacturing discontinuities from geometrical deviations, surface-quality attributes and process-dependent material responses. Literature published between 2010 and 2025 was retrieved through CrossRef and screened using a Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA)-informed procedure, resulting in 134 publications included in the final analytical corpus. The synthesis shows that defect formation is governed by interacting material, process and thermal-history variables and that apparently similar defect manifestations can arise from substantially different mechanisms across AM processes. Inspection capability is likewise process- and defect-dependent: X-ray computed tomography (XCT), including micro-computed tomography (µCT), is particularly suited to internal volumetric discontinuities, whereas optical and three-dimensional scanning primarily address external geometry and surface conformity. The principal contribution of the review is an integrated process–material response–quality manifestation–performance–inspection–qualification framework that connects process-dependent defect and quality formation with engineering consequences, inspection capability, quality-assurance decision-making and industrial qualification.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Mechanical Engineering and Manufacturing
Published
2026-11-10
DOI
https://doi.org/10.53941/jmem.2026.100041
Primary Topic
Additive Manufacturing and 3D Printing Technologies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
NOV
article

Defect Formation, Detection, and Quality Assurance in Additive Manufacturing: A Systematic Review

Isabel Mendes Pinto, Marta L. S. Barbosa, Naiara P. V. Sebbe, Rúben D. F. S. Costa et al.
Journal of Mechanical Engineering and Manufacturing
Additive Manufacturing and 3D Printing Technologies
article

Defect Formation, Detection, and Quality Assurance in Additive Manufacturing: A Systematic Review

Isabel Mendes Pinto, Marta L. S. Barbosa, Naiara P. V. Sebbe, Rúben D. F. S. Costa, Arnaldo G. Pinto, André F. V. Pedroso, André H. M. Rodrigues, José P. C. Gonçalves
article en

Abstract

Additive manufacturing (AM) enables the production of geometrically complex components but introduces process-dependent defects that may compromise dimensional accuracy, surface integrity and mechanical reliability. This systematic review examines defect formation, defect-sensitive quality phenomena, detection and quality assurance across the principal AM process categories, distinguishing discrete manufacturing discontinuities from geometrical deviations, surface-quality attributes and process-dependent material responses. Literature published between 2010 and 2025 was retrieved through CrossRef and screened using a Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA)-informed procedure, resulting in 134 publications included in the final analytical corpus. The synthesis shows that defect formation is governed by interacting material, process and thermal-history variables and that apparently similar defect manifestations can arise from substantially different mechanisms across AM processes. Inspection capability is likewise process- and defect-dependent: X-ray computed tomography (XCT), including micro-computed tomography (µCT), is particularly suited to internal volumetric discontinuities, whereas optical and three-dimensional scanning primarily address external geometry and surface conformity. The principal contribution of the review is an integrated process–material response–quality manifestation–performance–inspection–qualification framework that connects process-dependent defect and quality formation with engineering consequences, inspection capability, quality-assurance decision-making and industrial qualification.

Journal of Mechanical Engineering and Manufacturing
Universidade do Porto (PT), Institute of Mechanical Engineering and Industrial Mangement (PT), Laboratório Associado de Energia, Transportes e Aeronáutica (PT), Centro de Investigação e Desenvolvimento em Engenharia Mecânica (PT), Polytechnic Institute of Porto (PT)
Additive Manufacturing and 3D Printing Technologies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon