Opening the Commons: Community Land Trusts as a Strategy for Geoist Land Reform

Abstract Geoists hold that we have strong moral and economic reasons to equalize the rents of land, for example, by taxing its economic value and allocating the proceeds as a universal basic income. It is widely recognized among economists that such land value taxes are uniquely efficient and equitable. But despite its moral and economic virtues, the policy has proven politically intractable, as it would diminish the capitalized value of land as an asset. In this article, I explore an alternative strategy for socializing these land rents, using Community Land Trusts (CLTs). These could generate a bottom-up mechanism for rent redistribution that circumvents some political challenges to land value taxation. However, I argue that they may still remain vulnerable to problems of regulatory capture and rent-seeking. The paper integrates normative theory, public choice economics, and institutional design, and draws upon historical case studies to illustrate and evaluate the strategy’s viability.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Basic Income Studies
Published
2026-11-10
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1515/bis-2026-0002
Primary Topic
Collaborative and Sustainable Housing Initiatives
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
NOV
article

Opening the Commons: Community Land Trusts as a Strategy for Geoist Land Reform

Martin Jacobson
Basic Income Studies
Collaborative and Sustainable Housing Initiatives
article

Opening the Commons: Community Land Trusts as a Strategy for Geoist Land Reform

Martin Jacobson
article en

Abstract

Abstract Geoists hold that we have strong moral and economic reasons to equalize the rents of land, for example, by taxing its economic value and allocating the proceeds as a universal basic income. It is widely recognized among economists that such land value taxes are uniquely efficient and equitable. But despite its moral and economic virtues, the policy has proven politically intractable, as it would diminish the capitalized value of land as an asset. In this article, I explore an alternative strategy for socializing these land rents, using Community Land Trusts (CLTs). These could generate a bottom-up mechanism for rent redistribution that circumvents some political challenges to land value taxation. However, I argue that they may still remain vulnerable to problems of regulatory capture and rent-seeking. The paper integrates normative theory, public choice economics, and institutional design, and draws upon historical case studies to illustrate and evaluate the strategy’s viability.

Basic Income Studies
Uppsala University (SE)
Collaborative and Sustainable Housing Initiatives
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon