Development and External Validation of a Clinically Interpretable Prediction Model for Differentiating Crohn’s Disease from Intestinal Tuberculosis

Abstract Background Crohn's disease (CD) and intestinal tuberculosis (ITB) have overlapping clinical, endoscopic, radiologic, and histopathologic features, complicating diagnosis when confirmatory microbiologic or characteristic histopathologic evidence is unavailable. We developed a practical prediction model using routinely available diagnostic information. Methods A multivariable logistic regression model was developed in 132 complete cases (82 with CD and 50 with ITB) and evaluated using a fixed formula and cutoff in a same-center temporal validation cohort (n = 117) and an independent external validation cohort (n = 65). Discrimination, calibration, and classification performance were assessed. Results The final model included age at symptom onset, interferon-gamma release assay, and the numbers of endoscopic features supporting CD and ITB. The AUC was 0.970 (95% CI, 0.947–0.994) in development, 0.9994 (95% CI, 0.9980-1.0000) in temporal validation, and 0.9995 (95% CI, 0.9981-1.0000) in external validation. Accuracy was 97.4% and 95.4% in the two validation cohorts, respectively. The model generally underestimated ITB probability. Conclusions The concise model combining age at symptom onset, IGRA, and structured endoscopic features showed promising discrimination and classification performance in the validation cohorts and may assist CD-ITB differentiation. Prospective multicenter studies should evaluate calibration, clinical utility, and generalizability.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Research Square
Published
2026-11-10
DOI
https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-11330365/v1
Primary Topic
Diagnosis and treatment of tuberculosis
Type
preprint
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
NOV
preprint

Development and External Validation of a Clinically Interpretable Prediction Model for Differentiating Crohn’s Disease from Intestinal Tuberculosis

Dayong Sun, Chuyao Zhang, Xiaoyin Zhang¹, Weitao Wu² et al.
Research Square
Diagnosis and treatment of tuberculosis
preprint

Development and External Validation of a Clinically Interpretable Prediction Model for Differentiating Crohn’s Disease from Intestinal Tuberculosis

Dayong Sun, Chuyao Zhang, Xiaoyin Zhang¹, Weitao Wu², Ruibin Xu¹
preprint en

Abstract

Abstract Background Crohn's disease (CD) and intestinal tuberculosis (ITB) have overlapping clinical, endoscopic, radiologic, and histopathologic features, complicating diagnosis when confirmatory microbiologic or characteristic histopathologic evidence is unavailable. We developed a practical prediction model using routinely available diagnostic information. Methods A multivariable logistic regression model was developed in 132 complete cases (82 with CD and 50 with ITB) and evaluated using a fixed formula and cutoff in a same-center temporal validation cohort (n = 117) and an independent external validation cohort (n = 65). Discrimination, calibration, and classification performance were assessed. Results The final model included age at symptom onset, interferon-gamma release assay, and the numbers of endoscopic features supporting CD and ITB. The AUC was 0.970 (95% CI, 0.947–0.994) in development, 0.9994 (95% CI, 0.9980-1.0000) in temporal validation, and 0.9995 (95% CI, 0.9981-1.0000) in external validation. Accuracy was 97.4% and 95.4% in the two validation cohorts, respectively. The model generally underestimated ITB probability. Conclusions The concise model combining age at symptom onset, IGRA, and structured endoscopic features showed promising discrimination and classification performance in the validation cohorts and may assist CD-ITB differentiation. Prospective multicenter studies should evaluate calibration, clinical utility, and generalizability.

Research Square
Shenzhen Second People's Hospital (CN), Shenzhen Third People’s Hospital (CN)
Diagnosis and treatment of tuberculosis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon