REWARD ADMINISTRATION, INSTITUTIONAL JUSTICE AND EMPLOYEE MOTIVATION IN PUBLIC HIGHER INSTITUTIONS: EVIDENCE FROM AMBROSE ALLI UNIVERSITY, EKPOMA, EDO STATE, NIGERIA

This study examined reward administration, institutional justice and employee motivation among nonacademic staff of Ambrose Alli University, Ekpoma, Edo State, Nigeria. Specifically, it investigated employees’ perceptions of fairness in reward administration, the influence of compensation and welfare provisions on their work experiences, and the implications of compensation-related practices for employee commitment and institutional stability. The study adopted a descriptive survey design. The population comprised 3,759 non-academic staff, from which a sample of 362 was determined using Taro Yamane’s formula. A total of 341 valid questionnaires were returned, representing a 94.2% response rate. Data were collected through a structured questionnaire and in-depth interviews. Quantitative data were analysed using frequencies, percentages and mean scores, while interview responses were thematically analysed. Findings revealed perceived weaknesses in reward administration, particularly favouritism (mean = 3.75), inconsistent compensation practices (mean = 3.43) and limited transparency (mean = 1.40). Employees acknowledged the motivational importance of salary increases (mean = 3.54), higher pay (mean = 3.48), bonuses (mean = 3.43) and insurance benefits (mean = 3.39). However, concerns remained regarding the adequacy of the existing compensation package (mean = 2.04) and working environment (mean = 2.00). Furthermore, delayed salary arrears, unpaid promotion increments and non-negotiated deductions were associated with reduced morale, employee dissatisfaction and strained workplace relationships. The study concludes that fairness, transparency, adequate welfare provisions and timely payment of entitlements are essential for strengthening employee motivation and institutional trust. It recommends transparent reward procedures, improved welfare provisions, prompt payment of entitlements and equitable performance recognition

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2026-11-10
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.24108176
Primary Topic
Employee Performance and Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
NOV
article

REWARD ADMINISTRATION, INSTITUTIONAL JUSTICE AND EMPLOYEE MOTIVATION IN PUBLIC HIGHER INSTITUTIONS: EVIDENCE FROM AMBROSE ALLI UNIVERSITY, EKPOMA, EDO STATE, NIGERIA

COLLINS AKAHOMHEN, Prof. Julius Uduimho Azelama
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Employee Performance and Management
article

REWARD ADMINISTRATION, INSTITUTIONAL JUSTICE AND EMPLOYEE MOTIVATION IN PUBLIC HIGHER INSTITUTIONS: EVIDENCE FROM AMBROSE ALLI UNIVERSITY, EKPOMA, EDO STATE, NIGERIA

COLLINS AKAHOMHEN, Prof. Julius Uduimho Azelama
article en

Abstract

This study examined reward administration, institutional justice and employee motivation among nonacademic staff of Ambrose Alli University, Ekpoma, Edo State, Nigeria. Specifically, it investigated employees’ perceptions of fairness in reward administration, the influence of compensation and welfare provisions on their work experiences, and the implications of compensation-related practices for employee commitment and institutional stability. The study adopted a descriptive survey design. The population comprised 3,759 non-academic staff, from which a sample of 362 was determined using Taro Yamane’s formula. A total of 341 valid questionnaires were returned, representing a 94.2% response rate. Data were collected through a structured questionnaire and in-depth interviews. Quantitative data were analysed using frequencies, percentages and mean scores, while interview responses were thematically analysed. Findings revealed perceived weaknesses in reward administration, particularly favouritism (mean = 3.75), inconsistent compensation practices (mean = 3.43) and limited transparency (mean = 1.40). Employees acknowledged the motivational importance of salary increases (mean = 3.54), higher pay (mean = 3.48), bonuses (mean = 3.43) and insurance benefits (mean = 3.39). However, concerns remained regarding the adequacy of the existing compensation package (mean = 2.04) and working environment (mean = 2.00). Furthermore, delayed salary arrears, unpaid promotion increments and non-negotiated deductions were associated with reduced morale, employee dissatisfaction and strained workplace relationships. The study concludes that fairness, transparency, adequate welfare provisions and timely payment of entitlements are essential for strengthening employee motivation and institutional trust. It recommends transparent reward procedures, improved welfare provisions, prompt payment of entitlements and equitable performance recognition

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Ambrose Alli University (NG)
Employee Performance and Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon