The Drip Lands Further Out Than the Trench: Width, Wind, and Impact Energy at an Unguttered Eave

Buildings without gutters shed their roof water from the eave edge, and the standard remedy for the erosion and splashing that follow is a gravel-filled trench along the wall. Trenches are almost always dug to a conventional width — 300 mm is common — without any calculation of where the water actually lands. This paper computes the landing point from the fall trajectory. In still air, water leaving a 3.5 m eave at a stated edge velocity of 0.30 m/s lands 0.253 m from the wall face, and once a splash allowance of 0.15 m is added the trench must be 0.45 m wide to contain it; the conventional 300 mm trench therefore misses the drip line even with no wind at all, at every eave height examined from 2.5 m upward. A light wind of 2 m/s pushes the required width at a 3.5 m eave to 0.70 m, and a 600 mm trench — twice the conventional width — tolerates only about 1.55 m/s of wind at that height before the impact point passes its outer edge. The paper gives a width table over eave heights of 2.5 to 7.0 m and winds of 0 to 4 m/s, the gravel volume each width implies, and the impact energy the gravel must absorb, which rises from 34.4 J per litre at 3.5 m to 68.7 J per litre at 7.0 m. All results are simulated, not measured.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2026-11-10
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.24120018
Primary Topic
Urban Stormwater Management Solutions
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
NOV
article

The Drip Lands Further Out Than the Trench: Width, Wind, and Impact Energy at an Unguttered Eave

William Alexander Aldred
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Urban Stormwater Management Solutions
article

The Drip Lands Further Out Than the Trench: Width, Wind, and Impact Energy at an Unguttered Eave

William Alexander Aldred
article en

Abstract

Buildings without gutters shed their roof water from the eave edge, and the standard remedy for the erosion and splashing that follow is a gravel-filled trench along the wall. Trenches are almost always dug to a conventional width — 300 mm is common — without any calculation of where the water actually lands. This paper computes the landing point from the fall trajectory. In still air, water leaving a 3.5 m eave at a stated edge velocity of 0.30 m/s lands 0.253 m from the wall face, and once a splash allowance of 0.15 m is added the trench must be 0.45 m wide to contain it; the conventional 300 mm trench therefore misses the drip line even with no wind at all, at every eave height examined from 2.5 m upward. A light wind of 2 m/s pushes the required width at a 3.5 m eave to 0.70 m, and a 600 mm trench — twice the conventional width — tolerates only about 1.55 m/s of wind at that height before the impact point passes its outer edge. The paper gives a width table over eave heights of 2.5 to 7.0 m and winds of 0 to 4 m/s, the gravel volume each width implies, and the impact energy the gravel must absorb, which rises from 34.4 J per litre at 3.5 m to 68.7 J per litre at 7.0 m. All results are simulated, not measured.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Urban Stormwater Management Solutions
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon