A Constant-Envelope Pseudo-Random Phase-Coded Noise Radar Architecture for Micro-Motion Sensing Under Strong Clutter and Same-Slope Interference

The waveform architecture, not the downstream detector, determines whether a weak micro-motion target remains representable in the range profile under strong clutter and same-slope interference. This work quantifies that claim for a noise radar architecture built on a constant-envelope pseudo-random phase-coded waveform with deterministic linear-feedback-shift-register (LFSR) regeneration, compared against an identically parameterized frequency-modulated continuous-wave (FMCW) baseline. Using a physics-constrained simulation assembled exclusively from industry-standard radar primitives with datasheet-level front-end impairments, each failure mechanism is isolated as it cannot be in coupled measurements, and every headline metric is evaluated over 100 independent code realizations. A weak target adjacent to a 23-dB-stronger scatterer is masked by the FMCW baseline in 100/100 evaluations and preserved as a detectable local peak in 100/100 realizations; under same-slope mutual interference, the FMCW chain collapses (0.6±0.2 dB suppression, coherent ghosts in all realizations) while the pseudo-random architecture retains 33.9±0.6 dB; cabin multipath visibility headroom improves by 22.9 dB. The boundary is stated with equal precision: clean-scene sensitivity and cross-slope interference favor or match FMCW, and phase-domain vibration extraction is waveform-insensitive even under impairments. Among five pseudo-random candidates, constant envelope (0 dB PAPR) and deterministic regenerability—not randomness itself—are the attributes mandatory for single-chip integration. The contribution is a mechanism-level attribution of waveform-dependent transduction loss, not an absolute detection-performance claim. A related Chinese patent application (No. 202610040851.1) is published and cited in the manuscript; experimental validation with a radar evaluation module is planned as follow-up work.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2026-11-10
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.24095532
Primary Topic
Radar Systems and Signal Processing
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
NOV
article

A Constant-Envelope Pseudo-Random Phase-Coded Noise Radar Architecture for Micro-Motion Sensing Under Strong Clutter and Same-Slope Interference

Lei Lv
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Radar Systems and Signal Processing
article

A Constant-Envelope Pseudo-Random Phase-Coded Noise Radar Architecture for Micro-Motion Sensing Under Strong Clutter and Same-Slope Interference

Lei Lv
article en

Abstract

The waveform architecture, not the downstream detector, determines whether a weak micro-motion target remains representable in the range profile under strong clutter and same-slope interference. This work quantifies that claim for a noise radar architecture built on a constant-envelope pseudo-random phase-coded waveform with deterministic linear-feedback-shift-register (LFSR) regeneration, compared against an identically parameterized frequency-modulated continuous-wave (FMCW) baseline. Using a physics-constrained simulation assembled exclusively from industry-standard radar primitives with datasheet-level front-end impairments, each failure mechanism is isolated as it cannot be in coupled measurements, and every headline metric is evaluated over 100 independent code realizations. A weak target adjacent to a 23-dB-stronger scatterer is masked by the FMCW baseline in 100/100 evaluations and preserved as a detectable local peak in 100/100 realizations; under same-slope mutual interference, the FMCW chain collapses (0.6±0.2 dB suppression, coherent ghosts in all realizations) while the pseudo-random architecture retains 33.9±0.6 dB; cabin multipath visibility headroom improves by 22.9 dB. The boundary is stated with equal precision: clean-scene sensitivity and cross-slope interference favor or match FMCW, and phase-domain vibration extraction is waveform-insensitive even under impairments. Among five pseudo-random candidates, constant envelope (0 dB PAPR) and deterministic regenerability—not randomness itself—are the attributes mandatory for single-chip integration. The contribution is a mechanism-level attribution of waveform-dependent transduction loss, not an absolute detection-performance claim. A related Chinese patent application (No. 202610040851.1) is published and cited in the manuscript; experimental validation with a radar evaluation module is planned as follow-up work.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Radar Systems and Signal Processing
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon