The Refrigeration Multiplier: What Cold Computing Really Costs at the Wall

Removing one watt at cryogenic temperature T costs at least (300-T)/T watts at the wall, and more in a real refrigerator. This paper computes the ideal and realistic refrigeration multiplier at 77 K, 4 K, 1 K, 100 mK and 15 mK, derives the break-even condition for cold computing, and applies it to superconducting single-flux-quantum logic (conventional RSFQ and ERSFQ, including static bias dissipation) and to a published cryo-CMOS control processor at 4 K (23 mW per qubit). On the cited numbers, under assumptions favourable to the cold technologies, no complete cold technology examined is a net wall-plug winner today: conventional RSFQ loses by about a factor of 66 per operation at the wall, ERSFQ reaches approximate parity per switching event, and the cryo-CMOS controller costs 17.0 W per qubit at the wall. Model calculations, simulated not measured; computation script and full results are included.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2026-11-10
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.24102490
Primary Topic
Superconducting and THz Device Technology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
NOV
article

The Refrigeration Multiplier: What Cold Computing Really Costs at the Wall

William Alexander Aldred
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Superconducting and THz Device Technology
article

The Refrigeration Multiplier: What Cold Computing Really Costs at the Wall

William Alexander Aldred
article en

Abstract

Removing one watt at cryogenic temperature T costs at least (300-T)/T watts at the wall, and more in a real refrigerator. This paper computes the ideal and realistic refrigeration multiplier at 77 K, 4 K, 1 K, 100 mK and 15 mK, derives the break-even condition for cold computing, and applies it to superconducting single-flux-quantum logic (conventional RSFQ and ERSFQ, including static bias dissipation) and to a published cryo-CMOS control processor at 4 K (23 mW per qubit). On the cited numbers, under assumptions favourable to the cold technologies, no complete cold technology examined is a net wall-plug winner today: conventional RSFQ loses by about a factor of 66 per operation at the wall, ERSFQ reaches approximate parity per switching event, and the cryo-CMOS controller costs 17.0 W per qubit at the wall. Model calculations, simulated not measured; computation script and full results are included.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Superconducting and THz Device Technology
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon