Federal Reserve Dual Objectives and Conventional Monetary Policy Tools: A Review of Theory, Practice and Limitations

After the 2008 financial crisis, the Federal Reserve gradually refined its statutory dual-mandate framework of price stability and full employment, adopted a single inflation target and later an average inflation target, and returned to a traditional balance framework in 2025. Conventional interest rate tools have always been the core of its macroeconomic adjustment. At present, the global economy is increasingly volatile, and liquidity traps, high inflation and employment imbalances appear alternately. The regulation efficiency and application boundary of conventional benchmark interest rate regulation have become the focus of macro financial research. This paper adopts a literature review approach to systematically trace the evolution of the Federal Reserve's dual-mandate system, dismantle the operation logic of conventional monetary policy tools such as the federal funds rate, and review the practice of three rounds of target framework reform in 2012, 2020 and 2025 in stages to compare the regulatory effects of conventional interest rate tools under different economic cycles. The findings are as follows: conventional interest rate tools can effectively balance dual targets in the stage of moderate inflation and stable economic operation, but there are significant regulatory weaknesses in the scenario of zero lower bound interest rate and supply-shock inflation, compared with the policy objectives of major central banks in the world, there is a significant institutional difference between the Dual employment-first target mode of the Federal Reserve and the single inflation target of many countries. This paper summarizes the policy practice experience and system defects of the Federal Reserve, clarifies the applicable conditions and limitations of conventional monetary policy tools, and provides theoretical and practical reference for China to improve the framework of monetary policy regulation and stabilize prices and employment.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Advances in Economics Management and Political Sciences
Published
2026-11-10
DOI
https://doi.org/10.54254/2754-1169/2026.ab38908
Primary Topic
Monetary Policy and Economic Impact
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
NOV
article

Federal Reserve Dual Objectives and Conventional Monetary Policy Tools: A Review of Theory, Practice and Limitations

Ruiwen Bi
Advances in Economics Management and Political Sciences
Monetary Policy and Economic Impact
article

Federal Reserve Dual Objectives and Conventional Monetary Policy Tools: A Review of Theory, Practice and Limitations

Ruiwen Bi
article en

Abstract

After the 2008 financial crisis, the Federal Reserve gradually refined its statutory dual-mandate framework of price stability and full employment, adopted a single inflation target and later an average inflation target, and returned to a traditional balance framework in 2025. Conventional interest rate tools have always been the core of its macroeconomic adjustment. At present, the global economy is increasingly volatile, and liquidity traps, high inflation and employment imbalances appear alternately. The regulation efficiency and application boundary of conventional benchmark interest rate regulation have become the focus of macro financial research. This paper adopts a literature review approach to systematically trace the evolution of the Federal Reserve's dual-mandate system, dismantle the operation logic of conventional monetary policy tools such as the federal funds rate, and review the practice of three rounds of target framework reform in 2012, 2020 and 2025 in stages to compare the regulatory effects of conventional interest rate tools under different economic cycles. The findings are as follows: conventional interest rate tools can effectively balance dual targets in the stage of moderate inflation and stable economic operation, but there are significant regulatory weaknesses in the scenario of zero lower bound interest rate and supply-shock inflation, compared with the policy objectives of major central banks in the world, there is a significant institutional difference between the Dual employment-first target mode of the Federal Reserve and the single inflation target of many countries. This paper summarizes the policy practice experience and system defects of the Federal Reserve, clarifies the applicable conditions and limitations of conventional monetary policy tools, and provides theoretical and practical reference for China to improve the framework of monetary policy regulation and stabilize prices and employment.

Advances in Economics Management and Political SciencesVol. 312(1)
Shandong University of Finance and Economics (CN)
Monetary Policy and Economic Impact
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon