EFFECT OF MISSING STRUT LOCATION ON THE STIFFNESS AND STRESS OF BCC LATTICE SPECIMENS UNDER COMPRESSION

This paper numerically compares the axial stiffness and local stress of three BCC lattice specimens under compression. The intact REF model is compared with the INT and SIDE models, which have one missing internal strut and one missing strut near a lateral surface, respectively. All variants use the same linear elastic structural steel model, end plates, and prescribed axial displacement of 0.01 mm. Calculations were performed using nominal element sizes of 0.5 and 0.4 mm. Compared with REF, axial stiffness decreased by approximately 0.593% for INT and 0.276 – 0.282% for SIDE. The stiffness ranking remained unchanged for both meshes. The maximum local stress on the monitored retained strut was more sensitive to mesh size. For INT, the sign of the difference relative to REF also changed. The results demonstrate the need to evaluate the stiffness of the entire specimen and stress in the selected region separately.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
MM Science Journal
Published
2026-11-10
DOI
https://doi.org/10.17973/mmsj.2026_11_2026046
Primary Topic
Cellular and Composite Structures
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
NOV
article

EFFECT OF MISSING STRUT LOCATION ON THE STIFFNESS AND STRESS OF BCC LATTICE SPECIMENS UNDER COMPRESSION

Jozef Tkáč, Martin Koroľ, Dominik Čuha
MM Science Journal
Cellular and Composite Structures
article

EFFECT OF MISSING STRUT LOCATION ON THE STIFFNESS AND STRESS OF BCC LATTICE SPECIMENS UNDER COMPRESSION

Jozef Tkáč, Martin Koroľ, Dominik Čuha
article en

Abstract

This paper numerically compares the axial stiffness and local stress of three BCC lattice specimens under compression. The intact REF model is compared with the INT and SIDE models, which have one missing internal strut and one missing strut near a lateral surface, respectively. All variants use the same linear elastic structural steel model, end plates, and prescribed axial displacement of 0.01 mm. Calculations were performed using nominal element sizes of 0.5 and 0.4 mm. Compared with REF, axial stiffness decreased by approximately 0.593% for INT and 0.276 – 0.282% for SIDE. The stiffness ranking remained unchanged for both meshes. The maximum local stress on the monitored retained strut was more sensitive to mesh size. For INT, the sign of the difference relative to REF also changed. The results demonstrate the need to evaluate the stiffness of the entire specimen and stress in the selected region separately.

MM Science JournalVol. 2026(4)
Cellular and Composite Structures
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon