COVID vaccine data quality, cleaning, and management

When COVID-19 vaccines were introduced in late 2020 and widely distributed in early 2021, states were responsible for collecting and managing the data. In the best situation, states kept accurate records of each person who received the vaccine, including the age and the county of residence. States reported the cumulative number of those vaccinated in each county, although there were substantial numbers of vaccine recipients (within a given state) whose county of residence was unknown. Some states have very low numbers of vaccine recipients with unknown county, while other states reported upwards of 50% “unknown county of residence.” At the extreme, Texas did not report the county of residence until October 2021, although they did report the state-wide total. There were a number of states that reported a nearly simultaneous jump in the cumulative number of those vaccinated whose county of residence was known and a drop in the number of “unknowns,” likely caused by a retrospective analysis and reallocation of those whose county of residence was unknown. A further problem occurs when the cumulative number of vaccines drops. We describe how we created a database for county-level vaccine data that addresses these data quality issues.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Figshare
Published
2026-11-10
DOI
https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.34971188
Primary Topic
Vaccine Coverage and Hesitancy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
NOV
article

COVID vaccine data quality, cleaning, and management

Steven E. Rigdon, Thomas E. Burroughs, Fadel M. Megahed, Longwen Zhao et al.
Figshare
Vaccine Coverage and Hesitancy
article

COVID vaccine data quality, cleaning, and management

Steven E. Rigdon, Thomas E. Burroughs, Fadel M. Megahed, Longwen Zhao, L. Allison Jones‐Farmer, Kelly Ayres
article en

Abstract

When COVID-19 vaccines were introduced in late 2020 and widely distributed in early 2021, states were responsible for collecting and managing the data. In the best situation, states kept accurate records of each person who received the vaccine, including the age and the county of residence. States reported the cumulative number of those vaccinated in each county, although there were substantial numbers of vaccine recipients (within a given state) whose county of residence was unknown. Some states have very low numbers of vaccine recipients with unknown county, while other states reported upwards of 50% “unknown county of residence.” At the extreme, Texas did not report the county of residence until October 2021, although they did report the state-wide total. There were a number of states that reported a nearly simultaneous jump in the cumulative number of those vaccinated whose county of residence was known and a drop in the number of “unknowns,” likely caused by a retrospective analysis and reallocation of those whose county of residence was unknown. A further problem occurs when the cumulative number of vaccines drops. We describe how we created a database for county-level vaccine data that addresses these data quality issues.

Figshare
Vaccine Coverage and Hesitancy
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon