A Body-Powered Prosthetic Hand Priced by Cable Force and Excursion Budgets

A body-powered prosthetic hand is driven by a single Bowden cable from a shoulder harness. The user supplies both the cable tension and the cable excursion, and both are scarce. This paper prices a simple printed two-jaw hand entirely in those two budgets. Using stated harness design points — 110.0 N peak and 35.0 N sustained shoulder-protraction cable tension, 48.0 mm shoulder excursion and 65.0 mm elbow excursion — capstan friction for cable in lined housing (friction coefficient 0.12; transmission efficiency 0.6859 for a 180-degree route, 0.5681 for a typical 270-degree route, and 0.4705 for a 360-degree route), and rigid-lever jaw geometry (75.0 mm pivot-to-tip length, 14.0 mm cable moment arm, direct-drive force ratio 0.1867), the paper computes grip force for voluntary-opening and voluntary-closing configurations across transmission ratios from 1.0 to 4.0. A voluntary-opening hand whose spring is sized so the hand can still be opened at the 35.0 N sustained ceiling delivers only 3.7 N of grip in direct drive. A voluntary-closing hand at the recommended transmission ratio of 3.5, which needs 41.4 mm of the 48.0 mm shoulder excursion to open fully, delivers 13.0 N of grip at the sustained ceiling and 40.8 N at peak tension on the typical route. The absolute ceiling for the class — peak tension, the excursion-limited maximum ratio of 4.29, and the best routing — is 60.4 N, briefly equal to a typical 60.0 N myoelectric grip, while the sustainable grip is only 21.7% of that value. At the sustained grip the hand meets a 10.0 N light-activity pinch requirement but not a 20.0 N firm-activity requirement; it produces 0.23 N m of jar torque against a stated 2.0 N m requirement (114.3 N of grip would be needed) and cannot sustain the 45.0 N grip required for heavy tool control. Total parts cost is $58.16, about 257.9 times less than a $15000.00 myoelectric reference price. SIMULATED, NOT MEASURED: this is a computational design study; nothing was built, worn, or tested on people.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2026-11-10
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.24110032
Primary Topic
Prosthetics and Rehabilitation Robotics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
NOV
article

A Body-Powered Prosthetic Hand Priced by Cable Force and Excursion Budgets

William Alexander Aldred
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Prosthetics and Rehabilitation Robotics
article

A Body-Powered Prosthetic Hand Priced by Cable Force and Excursion Budgets

William Alexander Aldred
article en

Abstract

A body-powered prosthetic hand is driven by a single Bowden cable from a shoulder harness. The user supplies both the cable tension and the cable excursion, and both are scarce. This paper prices a simple printed two-jaw hand entirely in those two budgets. Using stated harness design points — 110.0 N peak and 35.0 N sustained shoulder-protraction cable tension, 48.0 mm shoulder excursion and 65.0 mm elbow excursion — capstan friction for cable in lined housing (friction coefficient 0.12; transmission efficiency 0.6859 for a 180-degree route, 0.5681 for a typical 270-degree route, and 0.4705 for a 360-degree route), and rigid-lever jaw geometry (75.0 mm pivot-to-tip length, 14.0 mm cable moment arm, direct-drive force ratio 0.1867), the paper computes grip force for voluntary-opening and voluntary-closing configurations across transmission ratios from 1.0 to 4.0. A voluntary-opening hand whose spring is sized so the hand can still be opened at the 35.0 N sustained ceiling delivers only 3.7 N of grip in direct drive. A voluntary-closing hand at the recommended transmission ratio of 3.5, which needs 41.4 mm of the 48.0 mm shoulder excursion to open fully, delivers 13.0 N of grip at the sustained ceiling and 40.8 N at peak tension on the typical route. The absolute ceiling for the class — peak tension, the excursion-limited maximum ratio of 4.29, and the best routing — is 60.4 N, briefly equal to a typical 60.0 N myoelectric grip, while the sustainable grip is only 21.7% of that value. At the sustained grip the hand meets a 10.0 N light-activity pinch requirement but not a 20.0 N firm-activity requirement; it produces 0.23 N m of jar torque against a stated 2.0 N m requirement (114.3 N of grip would be needed) and cannot sustain the 45.0 N grip required for heavy tool control. Total parts cost is $58.16, about 257.9 times less than a $15000.00 myoelectric reference price. SIMULATED, NOT MEASURED: this is a computational design study; nothing was built, worn, or tested on people.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Prosthetics and Rehabilitation Robotics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon