A Defense of Affirmative Action for Conservatives

ABSTRACT The suggestion that academia should promote political diversity, implying as it does that the status quo is severely deficient, is commonly rejected on the grounds that to do so would require “affirmative action for conservatives.” That conclusion is typically treated as a reductio ad absurdum even by those who support conventional race‐ and sex‐based affirmative action. Nevertheless, this paper defends affirmative action for conservatives on both negative and positive grounds. It argues that since conservatives are discriminated against throughout academia, policies that benefit them in admissions and hiring would not be unjust to those who bear its burden. And it argues that the advantages of increased political diversity would accrue not just to those with heterodox opinions but would improve the intellectual atmosphere of academia at large. Hence, conservative affirmative action promotes the traditional academic mission and its norms of meritocracy, academic freedom, and the pursuit of knowledge; and it is not unjust to those with orthodox political views.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Philosophy &amp Public Affairs
Published
2026-11-10
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/papa.70039
Primary Topic
Academic Freedom and Politics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
NOV
article

A Defense of Affirmative Action for Conservatives

Daniel Jacobson
Philosophy &amp Public Affairs
Academic Freedom and Politics
article

A Defense of Affirmative Action for Conservatives

Daniel Jacobson
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT The suggestion that academia should promote political diversity, implying as it does that the status quo is severely deficient, is commonly rejected on the grounds that to do so would require “affirmative action for conservatives.” That conclusion is typically treated as a reductio ad absurdum even by those who support conventional race‐ and sex‐based affirmative action. Nevertheless, this paper defends affirmative action for conservatives on both negative and positive grounds. It argues that since conservatives are discriminated against throughout academia, policies that benefit them in admissions and hiring would not be unjust to those who bear its burden. And it argues that the advantages of increased political diversity would accrue not just to those with heterodox opinions but would improve the intellectual atmosphere of academia at large. Hence, conservative affirmative action promotes the traditional academic mission and its norms of meritocracy, academic freedom, and the pursuit of knowledge; and it is not unjust to those with orthodox political views.

Philosophy &amp Public Affairs
University of Colorado Boulder (US)
Academic Freedom and Politics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon