CS3D and private enforcement

This contribution traces the evolution of the CS3D’s private enforcement mechanism from the 2024 Directive to Omnibus I, focusing on how private international law rules have shaped its effectiveness. Under the 2024 framework, the Directive provided for overriding mandatory civil liability rules, but it did not ensure access to Member State courts. The paper argues that the EU principle of effectiveness supported an implicit forum legis—a lesson relevant for future EU instruments with lois de police. It then shows that Omnibus I, by deleting the harmonised cause of action and the overriding mandatory characterisation, often leaves victims without effective redress under the applicable law ex Art 4 Rome II. The paper concludes that this regulatory choice substantially undermines the CS3D’s private enforcement, and that the only solution is to modify the Rome II Regulation along the lines of environmental torts.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
CUADERNOS DE DERECHO TRANSNACIONAL
Published
2026-11-10
DOI
https://doi.org/10.20318/cdt.2026.11003
Primary Topic
Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
NOV
article

CS3D and private enforcement

Sara Sánchez Fernández
CUADERNOS DE DERECHO TRANSNACIONAL
Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction
article

CS3D and private enforcement

Sara Sánchez Fernández
article en

Abstract

This contribution traces the evolution of the CS3D’s private enforcement mechanism from the 2024 Directive to Omnibus I, focusing on how private international law rules have shaped its effectiveness. Under the 2024 framework, the Directive provided for overriding mandatory civil liability rules, but it did not ensure access to Member State courts. The paper argues that the EU principle of effectiveness supported an implicit forum legis—a lesson relevant for future EU instruments with lois de police. It then shows that Omnibus I, by deleting the harmonised cause of action and the overriding mandatory characterisation, often leaves victims without effective redress under the applicable law ex Art 4 Rome II. The paper concludes that this regulatory choice substantially undermines the CS3D’s private enforcement, and that the only solution is to modify the Rome II Regulation along the lines of environmental torts.

CUADERNOS DE DERECHO TRANSNACIONALVol. 18(2)
Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon