Is Digitalization Forcing Older Thinkers to Rescue Their Own Theories?

This essay examines how the information revolution and digital transformation challenge the explanatory power and anthropocentric foundations of major twentieth-century philosophical and sociological theories. Drawing on Habermas, Searle, Singer, Rifkin, Beck, and Giddens, it explores how developments in artificial intelligence, synthetic biology, and climate change prompt theoretical modification or place established conceptual distinctions under pressure. Its central claim is that theories can become obsolete without being falsified: they may continue to explain the phenomena of their formative periods while accounting for a diminishing proportion of an expanding world of phenomena. The essay conceptualizes this process as a relative contraction of explanatory scope and an erosion of explanatory power. It further argues that modifications intended to preserve a theory’s relevance may compromise its conceptual integrity and identity, leaving revised theories to serve as provisional epistemic bridges between inherited frameworks and emerging digital realities.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2026-11-10
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.24101224
Primary Topic
Critical Theory and Philosophy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
NOV
article

Is Digitalization Forcing Older Thinkers to Rescue Their Own Theories?

Şevki Işıklı
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Critical Theory and Philosophy
article

Is Digitalization Forcing Older Thinkers to Rescue Their Own Theories?

Şevki Işıklı
article en

Abstract

This essay examines how the information revolution and digital transformation challenge the explanatory power and anthropocentric foundations of major twentieth-century philosophical and sociological theories. Drawing on Habermas, Searle, Singer, Rifkin, Beck, and Giddens, it explores how developments in artificial intelligence, synthetic biology, and climate change prompt theoretical modification or place established conceptual distinctions under pressure. Its central claim is that theories can become obsolete without being falsified: they may continue to explain the phenomena of their formative periods while accounting for a diminishing proportion of an expanding world of phenomena. The essay conceptualizes this process as a relative contraction of explanatory scope and an erosion of explanatory power. It further argues that modifications intended to preserve a theory’s relevance may compromise its conceptual integrity and identity, leaving revised theories to serve as provisional epistemic bridges between inherited frameworks and emerging digital realities.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Marmara University (TR)
Critical Theory and Philosophy
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon