Development of a climate-sensitive disease forecasting tool in the Horn of Africa: A multi-stakeholder exploration of priorities in Ethiopia, Kenya, Somalia, and Uganda

Extreme climate events impose significant impacts across the Horn of Africa. One way to monitor these is by using novel digital tools to forecast extreme events and climate-sensitive disease outbreaks. However, limited information exists on stakeholder use of such tools. This qualitative study identified key multidisciplinary stakeholders in Ethiopia, Kenya, Somalia, and Uganda, and conducted a needs assessment and gap analysis. Focal persons of multi-lateral agencies, government institutions and ministries, non-governmental organisations, and academic institutions, at regional, national, and sub-national levels, were engaged in Key Informant Interviews (KIIs; N = 63) and Focus Group Discussions (FGDs; N = 7, total participants = 57). Malaria (54.0%), Rift Valley Fever (RVF; 44.4%), cholera (39.7%), dengue fever (27.0%), and anthrax (14.3%) were the most frequently reported climate-sensitive disease priorities amongst KII participants. Country-level variations existed in the use of climate or environmental data to support disease decision-making (Kenya: 95.2% of KII participants, Uganda: 75.0%, Somalia: 64.3%, Ethiopia: 58.3%), electronic reporting systems (Kenya: 42.9%, Ethiopia: 41.7%, Somalia: 14.3%, Uganda: 12.5%), and modelled outputs (Kenya: 57.1%, Uganda: 25.0%, Somalia: 7.1%). FGD participants described barriers to sustainable digitalised systems including cost-effectiveness, lack of technological expertise or support, and poor Internet access, which may be addressed by engaging key national stakeholders, training provision, and financial resources. Overall, digital tool preferences for analysing, displaying or reporting data included provision of data summaries and visual aids, a dashboard format, and functions to download data for further analysis. This study provides critical insights into the needs of disease control stakeholders who would benefit from, and are the likely primary users of, digital tools to tackle the increasing threat of climate-sensitive diseases. It underscores the importance of applying context-specific approaches to supporting local capacity, which will inform the development of a sustainable Climate Sensitive Disease Forecasting Tool (CLIMSEDIS).

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
PLOS Global Public Health
Published
2026-11-10
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgph.0005634
Primary Topic
Climate Change and Health Impacts
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
NOV
article

Development of a climate-sensitive disease forecasting tool in the Horn of Africa: A multi-stakeholder exploration of priorities in Ethiopia, Kenya, Somalia, and Uganda

Mulugeta Tamire, Siobhan M. Mor, Yusuf Abdi Hared, Clovice Kankya et al.
PLOS Global Public Health
Climate Change and Health Impacts
article

Development of a climate-sensitive disease forecasting tool in the Horn of Africa: A multi-stakeholder exploration of priorities in Ethiopia, Kenya, Somalia, and Uganda

Mulugeta Tamire, Siobhan M. Mor, Yusuf Abdi Hared, Clovice Kankya, Tessa Rose Cornell, Louise A. Kelly‐Hope, Andrew P. Morse, Eric Maurice Fèvre, Cyril Caminade, Matthew Baylis, Rose Ayebale, John B Galiwango, Jane N. Nyambura, Davis Lois Nagadya
article en

Abstract

Extreme climate events impose significant impacts across the Horn of Africa. One way to monitor these is by using novel digital tools to forecast extreme events and climate-sensitive disease outbreaks. However, limited information exists on stakeholder use of such tools. This qualitative study identified key multidisciplinary stakeholders in Ethiopia, Kenya, Somalia, and Uganda, and conducted a needs assessment and gap analysis. Focal persons of multi-lateral agencies, government institutions and ministries, non-governmental organisations, and academic institutions, at regional, national, and sub-national levels, were engaged in Key Informant Interviews (KIIs; N = 63) and Focus Group Discussions (FGDs; N = 7, total participants = 57). Malaria (54.0%), Rift Valley Fever (RVF; 44.4%), cholera (39.7%), dengue fever (27.0%), and anthrax (14.3%) were the most frequently reported climate-sensitive disease priorities amongst KII participants. Country-level variations existed in the use of climate or environmental data to support disease decision-making (Kenya: 95.2% of KII participants, Uganda: 75.0%, Somalia: 64.3%, Ethiopia: 58.3%), electronic reporting systems (Kenya: 42.9%, Ethiopia: 41.7%, Somalia: 14.3%, Uganda: 12.5%), and modelled outputs (Kenya: 57.1%, Uganda: 25.0%, Somalia: 7.1%). FGD participants described barriers to sustainable digitalised systems including cost-effectiveness, lack of technological expertise or support, and poor Internet access, which may be addressed by engaging key national stakeholders, training provision, and financial resources. Overall, digital tool preferences for analysing, displaying or reporting data included provision of data summaries and visual aids, a dashboard format, and functions to download data for further analysis. This study provides critical insights into the needs of disease control stakeholders who would benefit from, and are the likely primary users of, digital tools to tackle the increasing threat of climate-sensitive diseases. It underscores the importance of applying context-specific approaches to supporting local capacity, which will inform the development of a sustainable Climate Sensitive Disease Forecasting Tool (CLIMSEDIS).

PLOS Global Public HealthVol. 6(11)
Dalarna University (SE), The Abdus Salam International Centre for Theoretical Physics (ICTP) (IT), University of Liverpool (GB), Amoud University (SO), Amref International University (KE), Addis Ababa University (ET), International Livestock Research Institute (KE), Makerere University (UG)
Climate Change and Health Impacts
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon