Factors Controlling the AVO Response of a BSR at a Gas Hydrate–Free Gas Interface

The bottom-simulating reflector (BSR) is an important seismic marker of the base of the gas hydrate stability zone and underlying free gas. Its amplitude variation with offset (AVO), expressed here as angle-dependent P–P reflection amplitude, depends on fluid composition, pore structure, clay content, and hydrate occurrence mode. Using a horizontal two-layer model, we compare the effects of hydrate saturation, free-gas saturation, hydrate reservoir porosity, clay content, and the hydrate frame participation fraction fms—the fraction of the total hydrate volume incorporated into the load-bearing solid phase—on BSR AVO responses. Elastic properties are calculated by solid averaging, a reference-constrained frame relation, fluid mixing, and Gassmann substitution. Response trends are checked using the exact Zoeppritz solution and two-dimensional staggered-grid finite-difference time-domain (FDTD) modeling, and the fms responses are compared between two dry-frame models. Increasing hydrate saturation from 0 to 80% changes the numerical intercept from −0.0971 to −0.2361; under uniform Wood mixing, the nonlinear free-gas response is concentrated at low saturation; porosity primarily changes the impedance contrast, whereas clay content primarily changes the amplitude variation with incidence angle. Increasing fms raises velocity, makes the intercept more negative, and increases the gradient, but whether the gradient changes sign depends on the frame model.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Marine Science and Engineering
Published
2026-11-10
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/jmse14222131
Primary Topic
Methane Hydrates and Related Phenomena
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
NOV
article

Factors Controlling the AVO Response of a BSR at a Gas Hydrate–Free Gas Interface

Hu Liguo, Shuang Mao, Pengqi Liu, Qi Li et al.
Journal of Marine Science and Engineering
Methane Hydrates and Related Phenomena
article

Factors Controlling the AVO Response of a BSR at a Gas Hydrate–Free Gas Interface

Hu Liguo, Shuang Mao, Pengqi Liu, Qi Li, Jiongfan Wei, Xiafei Lai, Min Qin
article en

Abstract

The bottom-simulating reflector (BSR) is an important seismic marker of the base of the gas hydrate stability zone and underlying free gas. Its amplitude variation with offset (AVO), expressed here as angle-dependent P–P reflection amplitude, depends on fluid composition, pore structure, clay content, and hydrate occurrence mode. Using a horizontal two-layer model, we compare the effects of hydrate saturation, free-gas saturation, hydrate reservoir porosity, clay content, and the hydrate frame participation fraction fms—the fraction of the total hydrate volume incorporated into the load-bearing solid phase—on BSR AVO responses. Elastic properties are calculated by solid averaging, a reference-constrained frame relation, fluid mixing, and Gassmann substitution. Response trends are checked using the exact Zoeppritz solution and two-dimensional staggered-grid finite-difference time-domain (FDTD) modeling, and the fms responses are compared between two dry-frame models. Increasing hydrate saturation from 0 to 80% changes the numerical intercept from −0.0971 to −0.2361; under uniform Wood mixing, the nonlinear free-gas response is concentrated at low saturation; porosity primarily changes the impedance contrast, whereas clay content primarily changes the amplitude variation with incidence angle. Increasing fms raises velocity, makes the intercept more negative, and increases the gradient, but whether the gradient changes sign depends on the frame model.

Journal of Marine Science and EngineeringVol. 14(22)
China University of Geosciences (Beijing) (CN), Guangzhou Marine Geological Survey (CN), China National Petroleum Corporation (China) (CN)
Methane Hydrates and Related Phenomena
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon