Beyond Protocol Automation: A Sociotechnical Framework for Understanding and Measuring CT and MRI Acquisition Protocol Adherence in Resource-Constrained Healthcare Settings

Background Adherence to computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) acquisition protocols is essential for image quality, diagnostic reliability, and patient safety. However, adherence is influenced by technological, infrastructural, professional, and organisational factors, particularly in resource-constrained healthcare settings. Artificial intelligence (AI) may support protocol standardisation and quality assurance, but its effectiveness depends on implementation context. Objective To examine how technological, infrastructural, human, and organisational determinants influence CT and MRI acquisition protocol adherence and develop a framework linking failure mechanisms to measurable outcomes and corrective strategies. Review approach: This narrative review synthesises literature on AI-enabled imaging technologies, technical infrastructure, professional competence, workflow demands, and organisational governance across protocol selection, acquisition, and post-acquisition quality assurance. Synthesis and contribution The review conceptualises protocol adherence as a sociotechnical process and proposes a determinant-to-failure-to-measurement framework linking contextual constraints to protocol-selection errors, acquisition deviations, and quality-assurance failures. It identifies potential indicators, including protocol deviations, omitted sequences, repeat examinations attributable to acquisition errors, and image adequacy, alongside context-appropriate interventions such as staff training, standardised checklists, protocol audits, and AI-enabled monitoring. Conclusion Sustainable improvement requires alignment between technology, infrastructure, professional competence, and organisational governance. The proposed framework may guide quality improvement and future research, although its relationships require empirical validation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
F1000Research
Published
2026-11-10
DOI
https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.193568.1
Primary Topic
Radiology practices and education
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
NOV
article

Beyond Protocol Automation: A Sociotechnical Framework for Understanding and Measuring CT and MRI Acquisition Protocol Adherence in Resource-Constrained Healthcare Settings

Fabian Chukwudi Ogenyi, Attah Kenneth Ifeanyi
F1000Research
Radiology practices and education
article

Beyond Protocol Automation: A Sociotechnical Framework for Understanding and Measuring CT and MRI Acquisition Protocol Adherence in Resource-Constrained Healthcare Settings

Fabian Chukwudi Ogenyi, Attah Kenneth Ifeanyi
article en

Abstract

Background Adherence to computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) acquisition protocols is essential for image quality, diagnostic reliability, and patient safety. However, adherence is influenced by technological, infrastructural, professional, and organisational factors, particularly in resource-constrained healthcare settings. Artificial intelligence (AI) may support protocol standardisation and quality assurance, but its effectiveness depends on implementation context. Objective To examine how technological, infrastructural, human, and organisational determinants influence CT and MRI acquisition protocol adherence and develop a framework linking failure mechanisms to measurable outcomes and corrective strategies. Review approach: This narrative review synthesises literature on AI-enabled imaging technologies, technical infrastructure, professional competence, workflow demands, and organisational governance across protocol selection, acquisition, and post-acquisition quality assurance. Synthesis and contribution The review conceptualises protocol adherence as a sociotechnical process and proposes a determinant-to-failure-to-measurement framework linking contextual constraints to protocol-selection errors, acquisition deviations, and quality-assurance failures. It identifies potential indicators, including protocol deviations, omitted sequences, repeat examinations attributable to acquisition errors, and image adequacy, alongside context-appropriate interventions such as staff training, standardised checklists, protocol audits, and AI-enabled monitoring. Conclusion Sustainable improvement requires alignment between technology, infrastructure, professional competence, and organisational governance. The proposed framework may guide quality improvement and future research, although its relationships require empirical validation.

F1000ResearchVol. 15
Kampala International University (UG)
Radiology practices and education
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon